Literature DB >> 9918446

A comparison of transthoracic impedance using standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads.

C D Deakin1, R M McLaren, G W Petley, F Clewlow, M J Dalrymple-Hay.   

Abstract

The success of defibrillation is related to transmyocardial current. This current is inversely proportional to transthoracic impedance (TTI). A similar TTI between different pads and paddles is important to deliver a consistent therapeutic dose to all subjects. Failure to do so may result in either insufficient or excessive transmyocardial current leading to a risk of failed defibrillation or tissue damage respectively. Several different types of defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads are currently available for clinical use but the TTI achieved with each type has not been established. We measured TTI using two types of commonly used paddles and self-adhesive pads to establish whether any significant differences exist between the products. TTI in 40 adult males was measured using defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads placed in the antero-apical position. Measurements were made using a 30 kHz low amplitude AC current and taken at end-expiration. Mean TTI (omega)+/-S.D. was 68.2+/-16.1 (Hewlett Packard paddles; A), 62.8+/-13.2 (Hewlett Packard pads; B), 64.6+/-14.3 (PhysioControl paddles; C) and 95.6+/-22.3 (PhysioControl pads; D). Significant differences existed between all groups (P < 0.05) except between B and C. Differences in TTI between A, B and C were small and probably of no clinical significance. TTI in group D is significantly larger. Although transmyocardial current is related to TTI, the relationship is complex and differences in TTI alone cannot predict the outcome from defibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9918446     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00117-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?

Authors:  Dana E Niles; Akira Nishisaki; Robert M Sutton; Sara Brunner; Mette Stavland; Shruthi Mahadevaiah; Peter A Meaney; Matthew R Maltese; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  How good is your defibrillation technique?

Authors:  Daniel M Sado; Charles D Deakin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.