Literature DB >> 8008545

Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.

D L Atkins1, R E Kerber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current flow, the major determinant of defibrillation success, depends on delivered energy and transthoracic impedance. Previous experimental data suggest that transthoracic impedance is higher using "pediatric" electrode paddles compared to the larger "adult" electrode paddles. There are few data from actual shocks to support the experimental studies. The purpose of this study was to measure transthoracic impedance during actual shock delivery and to determine the optimal electrode paddle size for pediatric defibrillation and cardioversion.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated all shocks of < or = 20 joules given to pediatric patients at the University of Iowa from 1988 to 1992. Data collected included energy selected by the operator, energy delivered by the defibrillator, peak current flow and transthoracic impedance. Data were analyzed by unpaired t test and linear regression.
RESULTS: Fifty-five shocks were delivered to 20 patients, age newborn to 8 years. Thirty-seven shocks were given with "pediatric" electrode paddles (surface area 21 cm2) and 18 with "adult" electrode paddles (surface area 83 cm2). Selected energy correlated well with delivered energy (r = .98, P < .0001). Delivered energy using "pediatric" electrodes did not differ from that delivered with "adult" electrodes (8.0 +/- 0.9 joules vs 10.5 +/- 1.2 joules P > .1). However transthoracic impedance was significantly higher with "pediatric" electrodes (78.1 +/- 4.4 ohms vs 54.6 +/- 2.7 ohms P < .0008), resulting in lower peak current flow through "pediatric" electrode paddles (6.2 +/- 0.5 amps vs 8.7 +/- 0.5 amps P < .002). There was no correlation between joules/kg and peak current flow (r = .26, P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Use of "pediatric" electrode paddles results in higher transthoracic impedance and thus lower peak current flow. In pediatric defibrillation, larger "adult" electrode paddles should be used as soon as chest size permits (approximately 10 kg). Lower transthoracic impedance results in higher current flow that facilitates cardioversion and defibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in the rural setting- case reports and review.

Authors:  Thiraviam P Ashok; Sanjay Sharma; Mahesh Jain
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-04

4.  Supraventricular tachycardia in children: a report of three cases, diagnosis and current management.

Authors:  P Venugopalan; A Shakeel; A Al Amry; S Jaya
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2000-01

5.  Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?

Authors:  Dana E Niles; Akira Nishisaki; Robert M Sutton; Sara Brunner; Mette Stavland; Shruthi Mahadevaiah; Peter A Meaney; Matthew R Maltese; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

Authors:  P Jones; N Lodé
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Elevated impedance during cardioversion in neonates with atrial flutter.

Authors:  Scott R Ceresnak; Thomas J Starc; Allan J Hordof; Robert H Pass; William J Bonney; Leonardo Liberman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Defibrillation in children.

Authors:  Sarah E Haskell; Dianne L Atkins
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-07

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.