BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine if the increasing use of multimodal breast imaging has influenced the time between the diagnosis of an operable breast cancer and definitive operative intervention over the past decade. Secondary objectives were to determine whether a higher number of imaging studies, or specifically magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were independent predictors of a longer treatment delay, or lead to a greater chance of having a mastectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at a large, academic medical center with operable breast cancer between February 1, 1998, and August 31, 2008. RESULTS: Time to treatment significantly increased over the study time period (mean of 21.8 days in 1998, 31.3 days in 2003, 41.1 days in 2008). In 2008, the only study year in which MRI was routinely used, patients with an MRI had a longer median time to treatment of 43 days versus 32 days for those who did not (P = .054). Those who had a preoperative MRI had a higher relative risk of having a mastectomy at 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.76; P = .33), although this result did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: The time to treatment of operable breast cancer has increased over the past 10 years, and multimodal breast imaging is likely associated with this increase. The effect of this increase on the type of operative procedure chosen and the impact on subsequent outcomes is unknown.
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine if the increasing use of multimodal breast imaging has influenced the time between the diagnosis of an operable breast cancer and definitive operative intervention over the past decade. Secondary objectives were to determine whether a higher number of imaging studies, or specifically magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were independent predictors of a longer treatment delay, or lead to a greater chance of having a mastectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at a large, academic medical center with operable breast cancer between February 1, 1998, and August 31, 2008. RESULTS: Time to treatment significantly increased over the study time period (mean of 21.8 days in 1998, 31.3 days in 2003, 41.1 days in 2008). In 2008, the only study year in which MRI was routinely used, patients with an MRI had a longer median time to treatment of 43 days versus 32 days for those who did not (P = .054). Those who had a preoperative MRI had a higher relative risk of having a mastectomy at 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.76; P = .33), although this result did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: The time to treatment of operable breast cancer has increased over the past 10 years, and multimodal breast imaging is likely associated with this increase. The effect of this increase on the type of operative procedure chosen and the impact on subsequent outcomes is unknown.
Authors: Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Eric Ross; Yu-Ning Wong; Sameer A Patel; Marcia Boraas; Neal S Topham; Brian L Egleston Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rebecca Selove; Barbara Kilbourne; Mary Kay Fadden; Maureen Sanderson; Maya Foster; Regina Offodile; Baqar Husaini; Charles Mouton; Robert S Levine Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2016-10-20
Authors: Mehra Golshan; Katya Losk; Melissa A Mallory; Kristen Camuso; Susan Troyan; Nancy U Lin; Sarah Kadish; Craig A Bunnell Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sheenu Chandwani; Prethibha A George; Michelle Azu; Elisa V Bandera; Christine B Ambrosone; George G Rhoads; Kitaw Demissie Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Tracy Onega; Julia E Weiss; Diana S M Buist; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha E Goodrich; Cristina O'Donoghue; Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Beth A Virnig; Caroline S Bennette; Rebecca A Hubbard Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Alice K Fortune-Greeley; Stephanie B Wheeler; Anne-Marie Meyer; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Andrea K Biddle; Hyman B Muss; William R Carpenter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Laura S Gold; Diana S M Buist; Elizabeth T Loggers; Ruth Etzioni; Larry Kessler; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Diana S M Buist; Laura S Gold; Steven Zeliadt; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Larry Kessler Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2016-07-25