Literature DB >> 24305978

Preoperative breast MRI and surgical outcomes in elderly women with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma: a population-based study.

Alice K Fortune-Greeley1, Stephanie B Wheeler, Anne-Marie Meyer, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Andrea K Biddle, Hyman B Muss, William R Carpenter.   

Abstract

Existing evidence suggests that preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might not improve surgical outcomes in the general breast cancer population. To determine if patients differentially benefit from breast MRI, we examined surgical outcomes-initial mastectomy, reoperation, and final mastectomy rates-among patients grouped by histologic type. We identified women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer from 2004 to 2007 in the SEER-Medicare dataset. We classified patients as having invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), mixed ductal/lobular carcinoma (IDLC) or other histologic type. Medicare claims were used to identify breast MRI and definitive surgeries during the initial surgical treatment episode. We used propensity score methods to account for the differential likelihood of exposure to MRI. Of the 20,332 patients who met our inclusion criteria for this study, 12.2 % had a preoperative breast MRI. Patients with ILC as compared to other histologic groups were most likely to receive MRI [OR 2.32; 95 % CI (2.02-2.67)]. In the propensity score-adjusted analyses, breast MRI was associated with an increased likelihood of an initial mastectomy for all patients and among all histologic subgroups. Among patients with ILC, having a breast MRI was associated with lower odds of a reoperation [OR 0.59; 95 % CI (0.40-0.86)], and an equal likelihood of a final mastectomy compared to similar patients without a breast MRI. Overall and among patients with IDC and IDLC, breast MRI was not significantly associated with a likelihood of a reoperation but was associated with greater odds of a final mastectomy. Our study provides evidence in support of the targeted use of preoperative breast MRI among patients with ILC to improve surgical planning; it does not provide evidence for the routine use of breast MRI among all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients or among patients with IDC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24305978      PMCID: PMC4093828          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2787-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  51 in total

1.  Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

Authors:  Tosiya Sato; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Hazard of recurrence among women after primary breast cancer treatment--a 10-year follow-up using data from SEER-Medicare.

Authors:  Lee Cheng; Michael D Swartz; Hui Zhao; Asha S Kapadia; Dejian Lai; Paul J Rowan; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Factors associated with breast MRI use: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Donald R Lannin; Laura J Horvath; Nina R Horowitz; Anees B Chagpar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Overview of the role of pre-operative breast MRI in the absence of evidence on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hwang; Dan E Schiller; Pavel Crystal; Ellen Maki; David R McCready
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  R M Mann; C E Loo; T Wobbes; P Bult; J O Barentsz; K G A Gilhuijs; C Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Ann B Nattinger; Arnold L Potosky; Kathleen Lang; Rajiv Mallick; Mark Berger; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Benjamin O Anderson; Janet R Daling; Roger E Moe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

1.  Surgical attitudes toward preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  S D Mukherjee; N Hodgson; P J Lovrics; K Dhamanaskar; S Chambers; J Sussman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?

Authors:  Eugene Ong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  Unifocal Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Tumor Size Concordance Between Preoperative Ultrasound Imaging and Postoperative Pathology.

Authors:  Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Gabriela Santos-Nunez; Rebecca Hultman
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Robin M Turner; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Predicting associations between microRNAs and target genes in breast cancer by bioinformatics analyses.

Authors:  Tianying Zheng; Xing Zhang; Yonggang Wang; Xiucui Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Locoregional treatment of breast cancer in women with and without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Julie E Weiss; Tracy Onega; Wendy DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Martha Goodrich; Anna N A Tosteson; Beth A Virnig; Cristina O'Donoghue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use by Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Weiwei Zhu; Julie Weiss; Karen J Wernli; Martha E Goodrich; Karla Kerlikowske; Wendy DeMartini; Elissa M Ozanne; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Justin E Bekelman; Aileen Chen; Ronald C Chen; Karen Hoffman; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith; James B Yu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Surgeon Attitudes and Use of MRI in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Sarah T Hawley; M Chandler McLeod; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 10.  Lobular breast cancer series: imaging.

Authors:  Karen Johnson; Deba Sarma; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.