Literature DB >> 23943885

Advanced diagnostic breast cancer imaging: variation and patterns of care in Washington state.

Laura S Gold1, Diana S M Buist, Elizabeth T Loggers, Ruth Etzioni, Larry Kessler, Scott D Ramsey, Sean D Sullivan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Because receipt of breast imaging likely occurs in nonrandom patterns, selection bias is an important issue in studies that attempt to elucidate associations between imaging and breast cancer outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze use of advanced diagnostic imaging in a cohort of patients with breast cancer insured by commercial, managed care, and public health plans by demographic, health insurance, and clinical variables from 2002 to 2009.
METHODS: We identified women with breast cancer diagnoses from a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry whose data could be linked to claims from participating health plans. We examined imaging that occurred between cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment and classified patients according to receipt of (1) mammography or ultrasound only; (2) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and (3) other advanced imaging (computed tomography [CT] of the chest, abdoment, and pelvis; positron emission tomography [PET]; or PET-CT). We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with receipt of breast MRI as well as other advanced imaging.
RESULTS: Commercial health plan, younger age, and later year of diagnosis were strongly associated with receipt of breast MRI and other advanced imaging. Women with prescription drug plans and those who had less comorbidities were more likely to have received breast MRI.
CONCLUSION: Use of breast MRI and other advanced imaging is increasing among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer; individual patient and insurance-related factors are associated with receipt of these imaging tests. Whether use of diagnostic advanced imaging affects outcomes such as re-excision, cancer recurrence, mortality rates, and costs of breast cancer treatment remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23943885      PMCID: PMC3770510          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  34 in total

1.  Scientific Presentation Award: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Susanne G Carpenter; Chee-Chee Stucky; Amylou C Dueck; Gwen Grimsby; Marina Giurescu; Heidi Apsey; Richard J Gray; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Increased use of MRI for breast cancer surveillance and staging is not associated with increased rate of mastectomy.

Authors:  Catherine M Dang; Karen Zaghiyan; Scott R Karlan; Edward H Phillips
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lindsay Turnbull; Sarah Brown; Ian Harvey; Catherine Olivier; Phil Drew; Vicky Napp; Andrew Hanby; Julia Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hwang; Dan E Schiller; Pavel Crystal; Ellen Maki; David R McCready
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rajini Katipamula; Amy C Degnim; Tanya Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Charles Loprinzi; Clive S Grant; Kathleen R Brandt; Sandhya Pruthi; Christopher G Chute; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch; James N Ingle; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Robin M Ciocca; Brian L Egleston; Linda Sesa; Kathryn Evers; Elin R Sigurdson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Sarah J Lord; Ruth M Warren; J Michael Dixon; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy?

Authors:  Kelli Pettit; Mary Ellen Swatske; Feng Gao; Lorena Salavaggione; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Barbara S Monsees; Timothy J Eberlein; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  9 in total

1.  Use of imaging for staging of early-stage breast cancer in two integrated health care systems: adherence with a choosing wisely recommendation.

Authors:  Erin E Hahn; Tania Tang; Janet S Lee; Corrine Munoz-Plaza; Joyce O Adesina; Ernest Shen; Braden Rowley; Jared L Maeda; David M Mosen; John C Ruckdeschel; Michael K Gould
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Imaging for distant metastases in women with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Christina Catley; Carl van Walraven; Angel Arnaout; Christopher M Booth; Matthew McInnes; Dean Fergusson; Susan Dent; Mark Clemons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Identifying tests related to breast cancer care in claims data.

Authors:  Benjamin L Franc; Robert Thombley; Yanting Luo; W John Boscardin; Hope S Rugo; David Seidenwurm; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Nash; Michael Goodman; Chun Chieh Lin; Rachel A Freedman; Laura S Dominici; Kevin Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Is MRI Helpful?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Allison Hirsch; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Erika J Schneble; Frederick L Flynt; Michael N Clemenshaw; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Chris Gallagher; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Nathan M Shumway
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Ian D Graham; Angel Arnaout; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Sasha Mazzarello; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-04-05

8.  Advanced Imaging and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Diana S M Buist; Laura S Gold; Steven Zeliadt; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Larry Kessler
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-07-25

9.  A blood screening test for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sid E O'Bryant; Melissa Edwards; Leigh Johnson; James Hall; Alcibiades E Villarreal; Gabrielle B Britton; Mary Quiceno; C Munro Cullum; Neill R Graff-Radford
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2016-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.