Literature DB >> 26307233

Variation in Additional Breast Imaging Orders and Impact on Surgical Wait Times at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Mehra Golshan1, Katya Losk2, Melissa A Mallory3, Kristen Camuso2, Susan Troyan3, Nancy U Lin4, Sarah Kadish2, Craig A Bunnell4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the multidisciplinary care model, breast imagers frequently provide second-opinion reviews of imaging studies performed at outside institutions. However, the need for additional imaging and timeliness of obtaining these studies has yet to be established. We sought to evaluate the frequency of additional imaging orders by breast surgeons and to evaluate the impact of this supplementary imaging on timeliness of surgery.
METHODS: We identified 2489 consecutive women with breast cancer who underwent first definitive surgery (FDS) at our comprehensive cancer center between 2011 and 2013. The number of breast-specific imaging studies performed for each patient between initial consultation and FDS was obtained. χ (2) tests were used to quantify the proportion of patients undergoing additional imaging by surgeon. Interval time between initial consultation and additional imaging and/or biopsy was calculated. The delay of additional imaging on time to FDS was assessed by t test.
RESULTS: Of 2489 patients, 615 (24.7 %) had at least one additional breast-specific imaging study performed between initial consultation and FDS, with 222 patients undergoing additional biopsies (8.9 %). The proportion of patients receiving imaging tests by breast surgeon ranged from 15 to 39 % (p < 0.0001). Patients receiving additional imaging had statistically longer wait times to FDS for BCT (21.4-28.5 days, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability exists in the utilization of additional breast-specific imaging and in the timeliness of obtaining these tests among breast surgeons. Further research is warranted to assess the sources and impact of this variation on patient care, cost, and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26307233      PMCID: PMC4688062          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4834-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Does time to definitive treatment matter in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Gloria R Sue; Donald R Lannin; Brigid Killelea; Theodore Tsangaris; Anees B Chagpar
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  A Patient-Centered Approach to Wait Times in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer in the Province of Ontario.

Authors:  Erin Cordeiro; Matthew Dixon; Natalie Coburn; Claire M B Holloway
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Erik Liederbach; Mark Sisco; Chihsiung Wang; Catherine Pesce; Susan Sharpe; David J Winchester; Katharine Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Preoperative delays in the US Medicare population with breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Eric Ross; Yu-Ning Wong; Sameer A Patel; Marcia Boraas; Neal S Topham; Brian L Egleston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Understanding process-of-care delays in surgical treatment of breast cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Katya Losk; Sarah Kadish; Nancy U Lin; Judith Hirshfield-Bartek; Linda Cutone; Yasuaki Sagara; Fatih Aydogan; Kristen Camuso; Saul N Weingart; Craig Bunnell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Wait times for breast cancer surgery: effect of magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative investigations on the diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Carolyn Nessim; Julian Winocour; Diana P M Holloway; Refik Saskin; Claire M B Holloway
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  The Influence of Radiology Image Consultation in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Katya Losk; Nancy U Lin; Yasuaki Sagara; Robyn L Birdwell; Linda Cutone; Kristen Camuso; Craig Bunnell; Fatih Aydogan; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

Authors:  J H Chang; E Vines; H Bertsch; D L Fraker; B J Czerniecki; E F Rosato; T Lawton; E F Conant; S G Orel; L Schuchter; K R Fox; N Zieber; J H Glick; L J Solin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast Imaging Second Opinions Impact Surgical Management.

Authors:  Tara Lynn Spivey; Kjirsten Ayn Carlson; Imke Janssen; Thomas R Witt; Peter Jokich; Andrea Madrigrano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Heidi D Nelson; Patricia A Carney; Donald L Weaver; Tracy Onega; Kimberly H Allison; Paul D Frederick; Anna N A Tosteson; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implementation of a Breast/Reconstruction Surgery Coordinator to Reduce Preoperative Delays for Patients Undergoing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Katya Losk; Melissa A Mallory; Kristen Camuso; Linda Cutone; Stephanie Caterson; Craig A Bunnell
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Impact of Second Opinions in Breast Cancer Diagnostics and Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  E Heeg; Y A Civil; M A Hillen; C H Smorenburg; L A E Woerdeman; E J Groen; H A O Winter-Warnars; M T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.