Literature DB >> 27111752

Breast MRI in the Diagnostic and Preoperative Workup Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Breast Cancer.

Tracy Onega1, Julia E Weiss, Diana S M Buist, Anna N A Tosteson, Louise M Henderson, Karla Kerlikowske, Martha E Goodrich, Cristina O'Donoghue, Karen J Wernli, Wendy B DeMartini, Beth A Virnig, Caroline S Bennette, Rebecca A Hubbard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the frequency and sequence of breast imaging and biopsy use for the diagnostic and preoperative workup of breast cancer according to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use among older women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using SEER-Medicare data from 2004 to 2010, we identified women with and without breast MRI as part of their diagnostic and preoperative breast cancer workup and measured the number and sequence of breast imaging and biopsy events per woman.
RESULTS: A total of 10,766 (20%) women had an MRI in the diagnostic/preoperative period, 32,178 (60%) had mammogram and ultrasound, and 10,669 (20%) had mammography alone. MRI use increased across study years, tripling from 2005 to 2009 (9%-29%). Women with MRI had higher rates of breast imaging and biopsy compared with those with mammogram and ultrasound or those with mammography alone (5.8 vs. 4.1 vs. 2.8, respectively). There were 4254 unique sequences of breast events; the dominant patterns for women with MRI were an MRI occurring at the end of the care pathway. Among women receiving an MRI postdiagnosis, 26% had a subsequent biopsy compared with 51% receiving a subsequent biopsy in the subgroup without MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: Older women who receive breast MRI undergo additional breast imaging and biopsy events. There is much variability in the diagnostic/preoperative work-up in older women, demonstrating the opportunity to increase standardization to optimize care for all women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27111752      PMCID: PMC5001851          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  27 in total

1.  Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Miller; Andrea M Abbott; Todd M Tuttle
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Robin Turner; Petra Macaskill; Lindsay W Turnbull; David R McCready; Todd M Tuttle; Neha Vapiwala; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani; Pietro Panizza; Chiara Del Frate; Franca Soldano; Miriam Isola; Francesco Sardanelli; Gian Marco Giuseppetti; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts.

Authors:  E S Hungness; M Safa; E A Shaughnessy; B S Aron; P A Gazder; H H Hawkins; E E Lower; C Seeskin; R S Yassin; P O Hasselgren
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Robin M Ciocca; Brian L Egleston; Linda Sesa; Kathryn Evers; Elin R Sigurdson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker; G Ong
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

9.  The 2013 Society of Surgical Oncology Susan G. Komen for the Cure Symposium: MRI in breast cancer: where are we now?

Authors:  Sarah McLaughlin; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Richard J Bleicher; David R McCready; Tari A King
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management.

Authors:  Meagan Elizabeth Brennan; Nehmat Houssami; Sarah Lord; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; J Michael Dixon; Ruth M L Warren; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Xiao Xu; Nicholas A Christakis; Howard P Forman; James B Yu; Brigid K Killelea; Shi-Yi Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Personal history of proliferative breast disease with atypia and risk of multifocal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen L Nutter; Julia E Weiss; Jonathan D Marotti; Richard J Barth; M Scottie Eliassen; Martha E Goodrich; Curtis L Petersen; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Shi-Yi Wang; Craig Evan Pollack; Brigid K Killelea; Howard P Forman; Cary P Gross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.