Literature DB >> 18239935

Effects of age and size in the ears of gekkotan lizards: auditory sensitivity, its determinants, and new insights into tetrapod middle-ear function.

Yehudah L Werner1, Lynda G Montgomery, Merav Seifan, James C Saunders.   

Abstract

Do related, differently sized species differ in size-related structural or functional traits merely because they mature at different points of a uniform allometric ontogenetic growth curve, or do they evolutionarily diverge? We tested ears of gekkotan lizards through experiments distinguishing the two. Auditory sensitivity was assessed by compound action potential (CAP) thresholds in eight species. The best thresholds characterizing species ranged 22-72 dB sound pressure level at 0.5-1.0 kHz. Direct acoustic stimulation of the columella footplate elevated thresholds by 25-50 dB. Intraspecific CAP sensitivity was primarily affected by body length in Eublepharis macularius, but by tympanic-membrane velocity in Oedura marmorata. The chief factor determining middle-ear function (difference in CAP sensitivity before and after middle-ear ablation) was body length in both species. A secondary factor was the middle-ear hydraulic lever ratio in E. macularius, but the mechanical lever in O. marmorata. When intra- and interspecific data were compared, the relation of CAP thresholds to body size in E. macularius resembled the interspecific regression. The intraspecific regression of auditory sensitivity over tympanic membrane velocity in O. marmorata differed from that calculated interspecifically. Hence, the evolutionary contribution to size effects on CAP sensitivity exceeds the ontogenetic contribution. Putatively, body length affects CAP sensitivity through absolute sizes of tympanic membrane and columella footplate. These newly discovered effects join those of the hydraulic lever and (interspecifically) hair-cell number to improve the hearing of larger species that vocally communicate across wider spaces, apparently throughout the Tetrapoda.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18239935     DOI: 10.1007/s00424-008-0462-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pflugers Arch        ISSN: 0031-6768            Impact factor:   3.657


  27 in total

1.  Relating middle-ear acoustic performance to body size in the cat family: measurements and models.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Effects of age and size in the ears of gekkonomorph lizards: middle-ear morphology with evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Yehudah L Werner; Shawn D Safford; Merav Seifan; James C Saunders
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-03

3.  Eye size in geckos: Asymmetry, allometry, sexual dimorphism, and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Yehudah L Werner; Tal Seifan
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.804

4.  Optimal temperatures for inner-ear performance in gekkonoid lizards.

Authors:  Y L Werner
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1976-03

5.  Changes in middle-ear input admittance during postnatal auditory development in chicks.

Authors:  J C Saunders; E M Relkin; J J Rosowski; C Bahl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The ontogenic development of the vertebrae in some gekkonoid lizards.

Authors:  Y L Werner
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Auditory development in the mouse: structural maturation of the middle ear.

Authors:  M Huangfu; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.804

8.  How body size affects middle-ear structure and function and auditory sensitivity in gekkonoid lizards.

Authors:  Y L Werner; L G Montgomery; S D Safford; P G Igic; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Middle-ear development. VI: Structural maturation of the rat conducting apparatus.

Authors:  W M Zimmer; D F Rosin; J C Saunders
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1994-08

10.  Middle ear development. III: Morphometric changes in the conducting apparatus of the Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; C K Bacon; J C Saunders
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  8 in total

1.  Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Coupled ears in lizards and crocodilians.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Hilary Bierman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07

4.  The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yezhong Tang; Catherine Carr; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

6.  Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard.

Authors:  Antonieta Labra; Claudio Reyes-Olivares; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez; Nelson A Velásquez; Mario Penna; Paul H Delano; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Aquatic birds have middle ears adapted to amphibious lifestyles.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Edward P Snelling; Maelle Connan; Mathieu Basille; Thomas A Clay; Rocío Joo; Samantha C Patrick; Richard A Phillips; Pierre A Pistorius; Peter G Ryan; Albert Snyman; Susana Clusella-Trullas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative anatomy of the middle ear in some lizard species with comments on the evolutionary changes within Squamata.

Authors:  Paola María Sánchez-Martínez; Juan D Daza; Julio Mario Hoyos
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.