Literature DB >> 10562581

Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63-72 years.

E Thiis-Evensen1, G S Hoff, J Sauar, B M Majak, M H Vatn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most cases of colorectal cancer originate from adenomas. Removing adenomas has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. The design of cost effective endoscopic screening programmes requires a knowledge of the distribution of adenomas in different age groups. AIM: To investigate the distribution of colorectal adenomas in older age groups in the normal population.
METHOD: A total of 356 men and women selected randomly from the population register were offered a colonoscopic screening examination to detect and remove polyps.
RESULTS: In all, 241(68%) subjects, mean age 67.4 years (range 62-73), attended. The caecum was intubated in 193 (80%), and in this group 32 (38%) women and 51 (47%) men had adenomas. One hundred and ten (54%) of the adenomas and 11 (39%) of the "high risk adenomas" (adenomas larger than 10 mm in diameter, adenomas containing villous components, and adenomas with severe dysplasia) were found proximal to the sigmoid colon. In 36 (43%) of the subjects with adenomas, the adenomas were only found proximal to the sigmoid colon. Twenty two (11%) subjects had more than two adenomas. Of 203 adenomas discovered, 189 (93%) were less than 10 mm in diameter.
CONCLUSION: More than half of the adenomas were localised proximal to the sigmoid colon, and, in nearly half of the adenoma bearing subjects examined, the adenoma was proximal to the descending colon. This indicates that a sigmoidoscopic screening examination in this age group would miss a substantial number of adenomas, but this may be acceptable as the vast majority of proximal adenomas do not progress to clinical cancer within the life expectancy of this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562581      PMCID: PMC1727750          DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.6.834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  41 in total

1.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

2.  Hyperplastic colonic polyps as a marker for adenomatous colonic polyps.

Authors:  A F Ansher; J H Lewis; D E Fleischer; E L Cattau; M J Collen; D A O'Kieffe; L Y Korman; S B Benjamin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Frequency of isolated proximal colonic polyps among patients referred for colonoscopy.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; F W Smith
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-02

4.  Factors affecting compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P A Farrands; J D Hardcastle; J Chamberlain; S Moss
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1984-02

5.  Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Endoscopic evaluation of size and localization of polyps.

Authors:  G Hoff; M Vatn
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Colon adenomas in patients with hyperplastic polyps.

Authors:  D Provenzale; Z Z Martin; K L Holland; R S Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; E R Fearon; S R Hamilton; S E Kern; A C Preisinger; M Leppert; Y Nakamura; R White; A M Smits; J L Bos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer.

Authors:  J C Clark; Y Collan; T J Eide; J Estève; S Ewen; N M Gibbs; O M Jensen; E Koskela; R MacLennan; J G Simpson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Atherosclerosis and polyps of the colon. Quantification of precursors of coronary heart disease and colon cancer.

Authors:  P Correa; J P Strong; W D Johnson; P Pizzolato; W Haenszel
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

10.  Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Design of a population screening study.

Authors:  G Hoff; M Vatn; E Gjone; S Larsen; J Sauar
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; I Arunkumar; A Koreli; W A Corbett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Implications of CEA and p53 overexpression in the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wesam A Nasif; Mahmoud Lotfy; Ibrahim H El-Sayed; Ayman El-Meghawry El-Kenawy; Mohamed El-Shahat; Nabil Gad El-Hak
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: true or false?

Authors:  Rachel A Callcut; Stephanie Kaufman; Robert Stone-Newsom; Patrick Remington; David Mahvi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Computed tomographic colonography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-10-01

5.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer makes screening sigmoidoscopy less useful for identifying carriers of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Paul Rozen; Irena Liphshitz; Micha Barchana
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  The Association between Distal Findings and Proximal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jason L W Huang; Y H Wang; Johnny Y Jiang; C P Yu; Y L Wu; P Chen; X Q Yuan; Harry H X Wang; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Prognostic factors in 165 elderly colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ke-Jun Nan; Hai-Xia Qin; Guang Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  An integrated approach to the detection of colorectal cancer utilizing proteomics and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Jie-Kai Yu; Yi-Ding Chen; Shu Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.