Literature DB >> 12584223

Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

G Gondal1, T Grotmol, B Hofstad, M Bretthauer, T J Eide, G Hoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of easily measured clinical variables at flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening that might predict a proximal advanced neoplasm (PAN).
METHODS: We studied 1833 subjects with biopsy verified adenomas at FS who subsequently underwent full colonoscopy.
RESULTS: A total of 387 (21%) subjects had proximal colonic neoplasms (PCN) and 85 (5%) had PAN. In univariate comparison, the risk of PAN increased more than threefold in the presence of a distal adenoma measuring either > or =10 mm in diameter or containing villous components. Multiplicity of distal adenomas, severe dysplasia, or age > or =60 years increased the risk of PAN more than twofold. In the multivariate model, the presence of a distal adenoma > or =10 mm, villousness, and multiplicity maintained their significance as predictive variables for increased risk of proximal neoplasms, whereas sex and severe dysplasia lost their significance. By recommending colonoscopy only to individuals with multiple (>1) adenomas or any high risk adenoma at FS, we would have reduced the number of colonoscopies by 1209 (66%) but would have missed 32 (38%) participants with PAN and 217 (56%) with PCN. By using a 60 cm endoscope instead of an ordinary colonoscope at FS, nine (2%) participants with advanced neoplasms, including three patients with cancer, would have been missed.
CONCLUSION: The present study supports the concept of defining "any adenoma" as a positive FS, qualifying for colonoscopy. We recommend the use of an ordinary colonoscope instead of a 60 cm sigmoidoscope for FS screening examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12584223      PMCID: PMC1773542          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.3.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  26 in total

1.  Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

Authors:  T F Imperiale; D R Wagner; C Y Lin; G N Larkin; J D Rogge; D F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.

Authors:  E Thiis-Evensen; G S Hoff; J Sauar; F Langmark; B M Majak; M H Vatn
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T R Levin; A Palitz; S Grossman; C Conell; L Finkler; L Ackerson; G Rumore; J V Selby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63-72 years.

Authors:  E Thiis-Evensen; G S Hoff; J Sauar; B M Majak; M H Vatn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk people: update of a community-based project.

Authors:  J A Collett; J K Olynyk; C F Platell
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-11-06       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and instrument design.

Authors:  J Painter; D B Saunders; G D Bell; C B Williams; R Pitt; J Bladen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 9.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool.

Authors:  W S Atkin
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy? The Polyp Prevention Trial.

Authors:  R E Schoen; D Corle; L Cranston; J L Weissfeld; P Lance; R Burt; F Iber; M Shike; J W Kikendall; M Hasson; K J Lewin; H D Appelman; E Paskett; J V Selby; E Lanza; A Schatzkin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are proximal colorectal cancers always associated with distal adenomas?

Authors:  A J M Watson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Prevalence of advanced colonic polyps in asymptomatic Chinese.

Authors:  Hui-Hsiung Liu; Meng-Chen Wu; Yeh Peng; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Magnus Løberg; Mette Kalager; Michael Bretthauer; Miguel A Hernán; Eline Aas; Tor J Eide; Eva Skovlund; Jørn Schneede; Kjell Magne Tveit; Geir Hoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer makes screening sigmoidoscopy less useful for identifying carriers of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Paul Rozen; Irena Liphshitz; Micha Barchana
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Potential role of apoptosis and apoptotic regulatory proteins in colorectal neoplasia: correlations with clinico-pathological parameters and survival.

Authors:  Maria Tzouvala; Andreas C Lazaris; George V Papatheodoridis; Chariklia Kouvidou; Thomas G Papathomas; Nikos Kavantzas; Ioannis Elemenoglou; Demetrios G Karamanolis; Emmanouil Agapitos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Metachronous cancer development in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas-multivariate risk model with independent and combined value of hTERT and survivin.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Emiel A M Janssen; Bianca Van Diermen; Hartwig Körner; Jan P A Baak
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  The relationship between distal and proximal colonic neoplasia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitra Dodou; Joost C F de Winter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Lifestyle as a predictor for colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Inger K Larsen; Tom Grotmol; Kari Almendingen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Risk of proximal colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic adults older than 50 years found to have distal hyperplastic polyps on routine colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Bradley D Collins
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2010

10.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 8.082

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.