Literature DB >> 16941174

Colorectal cancer screening coverage in Greece. PACMeR 02.01 study collaboration.

Konstantinos Kamposioras1, Davide Mauri, Vassilis Golfinopoulos, Georgios Ferentinos, Georgios Zacharias, Apostolos Xilomenos, Nikolaos P Polyzos, Magdalini Bristianou, Dimitra Chasioti, Athanasios Milousis, Angeliki Vittoraki, Georgios Koukourakis, Ioanna Chatziioannou, Panagiotis Papadopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer death in European countries and differences in screening implementation may in part explain USA vs European survival differences. Despite the evidence, no study has evaluated the population colorectal cancer screening (CCS) coverage in any European country. We aimed to index the current CCS practices among a large sample of Greek healthy adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey. Screening practice habits of 5,259 healthy adults, aged 50-80, were surveyed. Both overall and screening practices of stool occult blood test (SOBT), digital rectal examination (DRE), and colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy (COL/SIG) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the population analyzed, 90.1% declared that they were interested in cancer prevention activities. Overall SOBT practice rate within the last 2 years was 4.77%. When only screening procedures were analyzed, this percentage shrank to 1.73%. Overall and screening COL/SIG rates within the last 10 years were 8.76 and 1.74%, respectively. The respective proportions of individuals who underwent DRE were 14.54 and 5.2%. Evidence-based screening practices were influenced by age, family history of colorectal cancer, profession, and educational level; however, SOBT and colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy did not overcome 4.1 and 4.6% in any subpopulation analyzed.
CONCLUSION: The level of CCS coverage among the examined sample of Greek adults was discouraging. Surveys among other European countries are encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941174     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-006-0186-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003).

Authors:  P Boyle; P Autier; H Bartelink; J Baselga; P Boffetta; J Burn; H J G Burns; L Christensen; L Denis; M Dicato; V Diehl; R Doll; S Franceschi; C R Gillis; N Gray; L Griciute; A Hackshaw; M Kasler; M Kogevinas; S Kvinnsland; C La Vecchia; F Levi; J G McVie; P Maisonneuve; J M Martin-Moreno; J Newton Bishop; F Oleari; P Perrin; M Quinn; M Richards; U Ringborg; C Scully; E Siracka; H Storm; M Tubiana; T Tursz; U Veronesi; N Wald; W Weber; D G Zaridze; W Zatonski; H zur Hausen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patients.

Authors:  G Gatta; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; L A Gloeckler Ries; T Hakulinen; A Micheli; M Sant; A Verdecchia; F Berrino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S Fuchs; E L Giovannucci; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in Tuscany: first round results.

Authors:  G Grazzini; G Castiglione; C Ciabattoni; F Franceschini; D Giorgi; S Gozzi; P Mantellini; P Lopane; M Perco; T Rubeca; P Salvadori; C B Visioli; M Zappa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Body size and colorectal-cancer risk.

Authors:  A Russo; S Franceschi; C La Vecchia; L Dal Maso; M Montella; E Conti; A Giacosa; F Falcini; E Negri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-10-05       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology.

Authors:  G Gatta; L Ciccolallo; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; T Hakulinen; H Møller; F Berrino
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Colorectal cancer screening awareness among physicians in Greece.

Authors:  Apostolos Xilomenos; Davide Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Athanasia Gkinosati; Georgios Zacharias; Varvara Sidiropoulou; Panagiotis Papadopoulos; Georgios Chatzimichalis; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  4 in total

1.  Colocteral cancer management and prevention policies in Greece.

Authors:  Mary Geitona; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-01

2.  Barriers and Attitudes toward Breast Cancer Screening among Omani Women.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Azri; Kawther Al-Rubaie; Shamsa Al-Ghafri; Mustafa Al-Hinai; Sathiya Murthi Panchatcharam
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Double-blind control of the data manager doesn't have any impact on data entry reliability and should be considered as an avoidable cost.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Vasiliki Karampoiki; Jacopo Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Georgios Alexiou; Georgios Ferentinos; Lamprini Tsali; Ioanna Karathanasi; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Cancer screening in a middle-aged general population: factors associated with practices and attitudes.

Authors:  Stéphane Cullati; Agathe I Charvet-Bérard; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.