Literature DB >> 2070180

Assessment of the psychological impact of a breast screening programme.

A R Bull1, M J Campbell.   

Abstract

In order to assess the psychological effect of mammographic screening, questionnaires (which included psychometric tests) were sent to 750 women at invitation and, 6 weeks after screening, to 420 women normal after the first mammograph, to 240 women normal after special assessment, and to 68 women normal after open biopsy. Increasing degree of the investigation was associated both with increasing frequency of breast self examination (10% were practising breast self-examination at least once a week before screening compared with 24% for women after special assessment and 35% of women who had had an open biopsy (p less than 0.001)), and with greater confidence that any malignancy in the breast would have been found. Psychometric scores showed no increase of general levels of anxiety or depression in the screened groups. For anxiety, percentages abnormal were 5, 4, 2 and 6 for the four groups, respectively, and for depression the percentages abnormal were 5, 4, 4 and 6, respectively; 10% of screened women were more anxious about having breast cancer as a result of the screening. At least 10% of women proceeding to open biopsy of benign lesions require professional counselling and support. Psychological ill effects were not detected by the psychometric test among women who did not proceed to this final investigation. Behavioural changes did suggest a raised awareness or fear of potential cancer among the screened population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070180     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-762-510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network.

Authors:  C J Gibson; J Weiss; M Goodrich; T Onega
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening.

Authors:  Jessica T Defrank; Noel Brewer
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2010

4.  Impact of intermediate mammography assessment on the likelihood of false-positive results in breast cancer screening programmes.

Authors:  Nieves Ascunce; María Ederra; Josu Delfrade; Araceli Baroja; Nieves Erdozain; Raquel Zubizarreta; Dolores Salas; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; C Bancej; V Goel; J Snider; R G McAuley; B Irvine; L Kan; D Mirsky; M J Sabine; R McGilly; J S Caines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.

Authors:  S Bryan; J Brown; R Warren
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index: a multiattribute system for classifying the functional health impact of diagnostic testing.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; Jun Ying; James Stahl; Chung Yin Kong; Beverly Moy; Jessica Roy; Elkan Halpern
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Eduard Molins; Francesc Macià
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Screening and genetic counselling for relatives of patients with breast cancer in a family cancer clinic.

Authors:  R S Houlston; L Lemoine; E McCarter; S Harrington; K MacDermot; J Hinton; L Berger; J Slack
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  The effect of immediate reading of screening mammograms on medical care utilization and costs after false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Kate A Stewart; Peter J Neumann; Suzanne W Fletcher; Mary B Barton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.