Literature DB >> 19574274

False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network.

C J Gibson1, J Weiss, M Goodrich, T Onega.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: False positives occur in approximately 11% of screening mammographies in the USA and may be associated with psychologic sequelae.
METHODS: We sought to examine the association of false-positive mammography with depressed mood among women in a screening population. Using data from a state-based mammography registry, women who completed a standardized questionnaire between 7 May 2001 and 2 June 2003, a follow-up questionnaire between 19 June 2003 and 8 October 2004 and who received at least one screening mammogram during this interval were identified. False positives were examined in relation to depressed mood.
RESULTS: Eligibility criteria were met by 13 491 women with a median age of 63.9 (SD = 9.6). In the study population, 2107 (15.62%) experienced at least one false positive mammogram and 450 (3.34%) met criteria for depressed mood. Depressed mood was not significantly associated with false positives in the overall population [OR = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-1.28], but this association was seen among Non-White women (OR = 3.23; 95% CI = 1.32-7.91).
CONCLUSION: Depressed mood may differentially affect some populations as a harm associated with screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574274      PMCID: PMC2781722          DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  19 in total

1.  Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire: a population-based assessment.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Martha E Goodrich; Todd Mackenzie; Julia E Weiss; Steven P Poplack; Wendy S Wells; Linda Titus-Ernstoff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Psychological distress in U.S. women who have experienced false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Kangmin Zhu; Mona Shah; William Lawrence
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Ethnocultural women's experiences of breast cancer: a qualitative meta-study.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Depressive symptoms among women with an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Ethel Alderete; Teresa C Juarbe; Celia Patricia Kaplan; Rena Pasick; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women.

Authors:  Georgia N L Johnston Polacek; Mary Carol Ramos; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-25

6.  The New Hampshire Mammography Network: the development and design of a population-based registry.

Authors:  P A Carney; S P Poplack; W A Wells; B Littenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  M L Brown; F Houn; E A Sickles; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Xavier Castells; Eduard Molins; Francesc Macià
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.