Literature DB >> 20084464

Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index: a multiattribute system for classifying the functional health impact of diagnostic testing.

J Shannon Swan1, Jun Ying, James Stahl, Chung Yin Kong, Beverly Moy, Jessica Roy, Elkan Halpern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effects of testing and screening on quality of life may influence the future behavior of society, but have not been quantified. We derived a health classification and survey items for the morbidities of testing and screening, to be the foundation of a multiattribute utility instrument, the Temporary Utilities Index.
METHODS: Seventy-six women ranked the importance of attributes of the testing process after breast biopsy. Seven survey items on the testing process were subsequently developed and assessed for clarity by a second group of 19 patients. The items cover attributes of mental and physical well-being before, during, and after testing. A survey panel of 164 subjects accessed online used the items to endorse expected and experienced effects of colon screening and mammography. They also endorsed items from a colorectal benefits and barriers scale, a risk perception scale, and EQ-5D, to utilize in the analyses of validity of the TUI items.
RESULTS: Based on criteria from the literature and limited psychometric analysis, the items showed evidence of practicality, validity, and a strong association with barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: The TUI health classification and survey items show evidence of validity, and may inform economic analysis, once combined with utility weights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20084464     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9587-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  34 in total

1.  Small but quantifiable patient preference for MRA versus catheter angiography.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski; M L Lieber; M Magdenic; M T Modic; P M Ruggieri; T J Masaryk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients.

Authors:  T L Angtuaco; G D Banaad-Omiotek; C W Howden
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Assessment of the psychological impact of a breast screening programme.

Authors:  A R Bull; M J Campbell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?

Authors:  David Parkin; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey.

Authors:  J Brazier; T Usherwood; R Harper; K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C Donaldson; P Shackley
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with a prior history of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Joseph A Johnston; Patrick Brill-Edwards; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Stephen G Pauker; Mark H Eckman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Women's experience with breast biopsy.

Authors:  Sharon L Chappy
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.676

9.  Demographic and health factors associated with mammography utilization.

Authors:  Kirsten Barrett; Jeffrey Legg
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

10.  Experience with breast cancer, pre-screening perceived susceptibility and the psychological impact of screening.

Authors:  Pilvikki Absetz; Arja R Aro; Stephen R Sutton
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient-centered outcomes in imaging: quantifying value.

Authors:  Ruth C Carlos; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  The economic burden of incidentally detected findings.

Authors:  Alexander Ding; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Patient and societal value functions for the testing morbidities index.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; Chung Yin Kong; Janie M Lee; Omosalewa Itauma; Elkan F Halpern; Pablo A Lee; Sergey Vavinskiy; Olubunmi Williams; Emilie S Zoltick; Karen Donelan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphrey; Janie M Lee; Karen Donelan; Chung Y Kong; Olubunmi Williams; Omosalewa Itauma; Elkan F Halpern; Beverly J Gerade; Elizabeth A Rafferty; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Conceptualising 'Benefits Beyond Health' in the Context of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

Authors:  Lidia Engel; Stirling Bryan; David G T Whitehurst
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.981

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.