Literature DB >> 20700654

A cohort study investigating patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Youssef El Douaihy1, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Mayank Agarwal, Abhishek Srivastava, Sonal Grover, Kumaran Mudaliar, Sivaram Rajan, Amanda Lawlor, Robert Leung, Ashutosh Tewari.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is gaining widespread acceptance for the management of localized prostate cancer. However, data regarding patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes after RARP are scarce.
METHODS: We developed a structured program for preoperative education and evidence-based counseling using a multi-disciplinary team approach and measured its impact on patient satisfaction in a cohort of 377 consecutive patients who underwent RARP at our institution. Responses regarding overall, sexual, and continence satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: Fifty percent of our patient cohort replied to the questionnaire assessments. Ninety-three percent of responding patients expressed overall satisfaction after RARP with only 0.5% expressing regret at having had the operation. Biochemical recurrence and lack of continence correlated significantly with low levels of satisfaction, though sexual function was not significantly different among those satisfied and those not. Most patients (97%) valued oncologic outcome as their top priority, with regaining of urinary control being the commonest second priority (60%).
CONCLUSIONS: RARP appears to be associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction in a cohort of patients subjected to a structured preoperative education and counseling program. Oncologic outcomes are most important to these patients and have the largest influence on satisfaction scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700654     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9817-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  36 in total

1.  Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Robert A Leung; Masato Fujisawa; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Editorial comment on: Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; M Weinstein; J E Tomaszewski; D Schultz; M Rhude; S Rocha; A Wein; J P Richie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Andrea Thomas; Taylor Murray; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Rebecca A Nelson; Timothy G Wilson; Mark H Kawachi; S Adam Ramin; Clayton Lau; Laura E Crocitto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  W J Catalona; J W Basler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ithaar H Derweesh; Patrick A Kupelian; Craig Zippe; Howard S Levin; Jennifer Brainard; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jonathan Myles; Alwyn M Reuther; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment.

Authors:  Mieke A Soens; David J Birnbach; Jayanthie S Ranasinghe; André van Zundert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  Managing uncertainty about treatment decision making in early stage prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Merle H Mishel; Barbara B Germino; Lin Lin; Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen; Jaime Crandell; Diane Blyler
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-09

10.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view.

Authors:  E S Geary; T E Dendinger; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Wilson; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery.

Authors:  Emma Long; Fiona Kew
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Health Related Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparative Retrospective Study of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Yoko Miyoshi; Shuichi Morizane; Masashi Honda; Katsuya Hikita; Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Yusuke Kimura; Shin-Ichi Yoshioka; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.641

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.