Literature DB >> 32158334

Health Related Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparative Retrospective Study of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy.

Yoko Miyoshi1, Shuichi Morizane2, Masashi Honda3, Katsuya Hikita2, Hideto Iwamoto3, Tetsuya Yumioka4, Yusuke Kimura3, Shin-Ichi Yoshioka5, Atsushi Takenaka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are standard treatments for localized prostate cancer. When making decisions about treatment, it is important to not only consider medical information such as the patient's age, performance status, and complications, but also the impact on quality of life (QOL) after treatment. Our purpose was to compare health related quality of life (HRQOL) after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus radiation therapy in Japanese patients with localized prostate cancer retrospectively.
METHODS: Patients with localized prostate cancer receiving RARP or radiotherapy at Tottori University Hospital between October 2010 and December 2014 were enrolled in a retrospective observational study with follow-up for 24 months to December 2016. The Medical Outcome Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey was performed before treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment.
RESULTS: Complete responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 154/227 patients receiving RARP, 41/67 patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 35/82 patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy, and 18/28 patients given low dose rate brachytherapy plus external beam radiation therapy. The median physical component summary score of the Medical Outcome Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey was significantly lower at 1 month after prostatectomy than radiotherapy, but was similar for both treatments at 3 months, and was significantly higher at 6, 12 and 24 months after prostatectomy. The median mental component summary score was also significantly lower in the prostatectomy group at 1 month, but not from 3 months onwards.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that HRQOL was inferior at 1 month after RARP, however, recovered at 3 months after RARP and was better than after radiotherapy at 6, 12, and 24 months. ©2020 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Outcome Study 8-Item Short Form Health Survey; health related quality of life; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; radiation therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32158334      PMCID: PMC7028529          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2020.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  26 in total

1.  Urinary and Rectal Toxicity Profiles After Permanent Iodine-125 Implant Brachytherapy in Japanese Men: Nationwide J-POPS Multi-institutional Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Toshio Ohashi; Atsunori Yorozu; Shiro Saito; Nobumichi Tanaka; Norihisa Katayama; Shinsuke Kojima; Shinichiro Maruo; Takashi Kikuchi; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for prostate cancer (summary: Japanese Urological Association, 2016 edition).

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Mikio Sugimoto; Rikiya Taoka
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Quality of Life After Open Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anna Wallerstedt; Tommy Nyberg; Stefan Carlsson; Thordis Thorsteinsdottir; Johan Stranne; Stavros I Tyritzis; Karin Stinesen Kollberg; Jonas Hugosson; Anders Bjartell; Ulrica Wilderäng; Peter Wiklund; Gunnar Steineck; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-02-01

4.  Long-term results of a randomized trial for the treatment of Stages B2 and C prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy with a common endocrine therapy in both modalities.

Authors:  K Akakura; S Isaka; S Akimoto; H Ito; K Okada; T Hachiya; O Yoshida; Y Arai; M Usami; T Kotake; K Tobisu; Y Ohashi; Y Sumiyoshi; T Kakizoe; J Shimazaki
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality.

Authors:  J W Davis; D A Kuban; D F Lynch; P F Schellhammer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A cohort study investigating patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Youssef El Douaihy; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Mayank Agarwal; Abhishek Srivastava; Sonal Grover; Kumaran Mudaliar; Sivaram Rajan; Amanda Lawlor; Robert Leung; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Who makes the decision regarding the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer--the patient or physician?: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Ronald C Chen; Jeannette T Bensen; George J Knafl; Matthew E Nielsen; Laura Farnan; Eric M Wallen; Merle Mishel; Raj S Pruthi; James L Mohler; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy of a single implant with two fractions combined with external beam radiotherapy for hormone-naive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Morio Sato; Takashi Mori; Shintaro Shirai; Kazushi Kishi; Takeshi Inagaki; Isao Hara
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; J E Ware; M Kosinski; S Wada; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the clinical data and impact of treatment technique.

Authors:  Louise Murray; Ann Henry; Peter Hoskin; Frank-Andre Siebert; Jack Venselaar
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of the type of surgery performed due to prostate cancer on preoperative patient anxiety, a prospective study.

Authors:  Batuhan Ergani; Mert Hamza Ozbilen; Mehmet Yigit Yalcın; Hayal Boyacıoglu; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  Changes in sexual function and serum testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer after image-guided proton therapy.

Authors:  Yukiko Hattori; Hiromitsu Iwata; Koichiro Nakajima; Kento Nomura; Kensuke Hayashi; Toshiyuki Toshito; Shingo Hashimoto; Yukihiro Umemoto; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.