Literature DB >> 11696732

Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era.

A V D'Amico1, R Whittington, S B Malkowicz, M Weinstein, J E Tomaszewski, D Schultz, M Rhude, S Rocha, A Wein, J P Richie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of previously defined risk groups to predict prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome 10 years after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer during the PSA era.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2000, 2,127 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy, including 1,027 at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (study cohort) and 1,100 at Brigham and Women's Hospital (validation cohort). Cox regression analysis was done to calculate the relative risk of PSA failure with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in patients at intermediate and high versus low risk. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial method was used to estimate PSA outcome 10 years after radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Compared with low risk patients (stages T1c to 2a disease, PSA 10 ng./ml. or less and Gleason score 6 or less) the relative risk of PSA failure in those at intermediate (stage T2b disease or PSA greater than 10 to 20 ng./ml. or less, or Gleason score 7) and high (stage T2c disease, or PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. or Gleason score 8 or greater) risk was 3.8 (95% CI 2.6 to 5.7) and 9.6 (95% CI 6.6 to 13.9) in the study cohort, and 3.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 4.8) and 6.3 (95% CI 4.3 to 9.4) in the validation cohort. The 10-year PSA failure-free survival rate in the 1,020 patients in the low, 693 in the intermediate and 414 in the high risk groups was 83%, 46% and 29%, respectively (p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on 10-year actuarial estimates of PSA outcome after radical prostatectomy 3 groups of patients were identified using preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score and 1992 clinical T category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11696732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer using multivariate mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Christopher H Morrell; Larry J Brant; Shan Sheng; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.404

2.  Should we abstain from Gleason score 2-4 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer? Results of a German multicentre study.

Authors:  Sabine Brookman-May; Matthias May; Wolf-Ferdinand Wieland; Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Gunia; Stefan Koch; Christian Gilfrich; Jan Roigas; Bernd Hoschke; Maximilian Burger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Risk of biochemical recurrence and timing of radiotherapy in pT3a N0 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin : A single center experience.

Authors:  Nina-Sophie Hegemann; Sebastian Morcinek; Alexander Buchner; Alexander Karl; Christian Stief; Ruth Knüchel; Stefanie Corradini; Minglun Li; Claus Belka; Ute Ganswindt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  4FISH-IF, a four-color dual-gene FISH combined with p63 immunofluorescence to evaluate NKX3.1 and MYC status in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dominique Trudel; Gaetano Zafarana; Jenna Sykes; Cherry L Have; Robert G Bristow; Theo van der Kwast
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Carolina Coelius; Meike Adam; Pierre Tennstedt; Luis Kluth; Thomas Steuber; Hans Heinzer; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Uwe Michl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Radical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high-risk group: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Motonobu Nakamura; Ken Hishikawa; Atsushi Fukuda; Takashi Matsumoto; Kenichi Nishiyama; Takeharu Yamanaka; Yoshihiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-15

Review 7.  Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Time between diagnosis and surgical treatment on pathological and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer: does it matter?

Authors:  Mariana Andozia Morini; Roberto Lodeiro Muller; Paulo César Barbosa de Castro Junior; Rafael José de Souza; Eliney Ferreira Faria
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

10.  Prostate cancer specific survival in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Amanda Black; Howard L Parnes; Robert Grubb; E David Crawford; Anthony Miller; Douglas Reding; Gerald Andriole
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.