Literature DB >> 29288373

Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery.

Emma Long1,2, Fiona Kew3.   

Abstract

This study is a service evaluation of the robotic-assisted surgery service within the Gynaecology Oncology department at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. The aim is not only to evaluate and improve this new service within the department, but also to add to the available literature that reviews patient satisfaction with robotic-assisted surgery. An anonymous questionnaire was developed with questions taken from the NHS User Experience Survey Question Bank and additional questions in the same format specific to robotic-assisted surgery. This was posted to the first 140 patients to have undergone robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at STH. One hundred completed questionnaires were returned. Over 90% of patients were pleased with the care that they received pre-operatively and felt that they have enough input into the decisions made about treatment. Half of patients (51%) reported having pain post-procedure, with a quarter of these patients experiencing severe pain. The majority of patients (72%) felt that their length of stay in hospital was of the right duration. Almost all patients (99%) were pleased with the overall care that they received and 91% would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality. Patients are very satisfied with the care that they receive when undergoing robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at our center and the majority of patients would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynaecology oncology; Patient satisfaction; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29288373     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0772-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giorgia Gaia; Robert W Holloway; Luigi Santoro; Sarfraz Ahmad; Elena Di Silverio; Arsenio Spinillo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Authors:  Martin K Oehler
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 3.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Proposed changes for nurse education in England (UK) as a result of the Darzi report (DoH, 2008a) Health Quality Care for All--NHS next stage review final report: some initial observations.

Authors:  Karen Holland
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.281

Review 5.  Current status of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Ada T L Ng; P C Tam
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.227

Review 6.  The use of robotics in surgery: a review.

Authors:  A Hussain; A Malik; M U Halim; A M Ali
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Minna M Mäenpää; Kari Nieminen; Eija I Tomás; Marita Laurila; Tiina H Luukkaala; Johanna U Mäenpää
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Hysterectomy for Uterine Cancer in the Elderly: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Techniques.

Authors:  Andrew Zakhari; Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman; Andrea R Spence; Walter H Gotlieb; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Richard G Arms; Charlotte C Sun; Jennifer K Burzawa; Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Vijayashri Rallapalli; Shannon N Westin; Larissa A Meyer; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Perioperative Outcomes for Laparotomy Compared to Robotic Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer in the Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Floor J Backes; Adam C ElNaggar; Michael Ryan Farrell; Lorna A Brudie; Sarfraz Ahmad; Ritu Salani; David E Cohn; Robert W Holloway; Jeffrey M Fowler; David M O'Malley
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.437

View more
  3 in total

1.  Multiple perceptions of robotic-assisted surgery among surgeons and patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Saad A Aldousari; Ali J Buabbas; Said M Yaiesh; Rawan J Alyousef; Abdullah N Alenezi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-08-10

2.  Patient-reported satisfaction after robot-assisted hysterectomy among Korean patients with benign uterine disease.

Authors:  Suyeon Park; Young-Eun Lee; Seong-Sik Cho; Sung-Ho Park; Sung Taek Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-10-11

3.  Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.

Authors:  Seon Hee Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.