Ana Wilson1, Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly1, Timothy M Pawlik2. 1. Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA. tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often carry significant risk and may have uncertain outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on patient and physician regret in the surgical setting. METHODS: A search of the English literature between 1986 and 2016 that examined patient and physician self-reported decisional regret was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies performed in patients and physicians participating in elective surgical treatment were included. RESULTS: Of 889 studies identified, 73 patient studies and 6 physician studies met inclusion criteria. Among the 73 patient studies, 57.5% examined patients with a cancer diagnosis, with breast (26.0%) and prostate (28.8%) cancers being most common. Interestingly, self-reported patient regret was relatively uncommon with an average prevalence across studies of 14.4%. Factors most often associated with regret included type of surgery, disease-specific quality of life, and shared decision making. Only 6 studies were identified that focused on physician regret; 2 pertained to surgical decision making. These studies primarily measured regret of omission and commission using hypothetical case scenarios and used the results to develop decision curve analysis tools. CONCLUSION: Self-reported decisional regret was present in about 1 in 7 surgical patients. Factors associated with regret were both patient- and procedure related. While most studies focused on patient regret, little data exist on how physician regret affects shared decision making.
OBJECTIVE: Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often carry significant risk and may have uncertain outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on patient and physician regret in the surgical setting. METHODS: A search of the English literature between 1986 and 2016 that examined patient and physician self-reported decisional regret was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies performed in patients and physicians participating in elective surgical treatment were included. RESULTS: Of 889 studies identified, 73 patient studies and 6 physician studies met inclusion criteria. Among the 73 patient studies, 57.5% examined patients with a cancer diagnosis, with breast (26.0%) and prostate (28.8%) cancers being most common. Interestingly, self-reported patient regret was relatively uncommon with an average prevalence across studies of 14.4%. Factors most often associated with regret included type of surgery, disease-specific quality of life, and shared decision making. Only 6 studies were identified that focused on physician regret; 2 pertained to surgical decision making. These studies primarily measured regret of omission and commission using hypothetical case scenarios and used the results to develop decision curve analysis tools. CONCLUSION: Self-reported decisional regret was present in about 1 in 7 surgical patients. Factors associated with regret were both patient- and procedure related. While most studies focused on patient regret, little data exist on how physician regret affects shared decision making.
Authors: B A Mahal; M-H Chen; C L Bennett; M W Kattan; O Sartor; K Stein; A V D'Amico; P L Nguyen Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Cary P Gross; Eric W Vogel; Abhay J Dhond; Cheryl B Marple; Roger A Edwards; Ole Hauch; Elizabeth A Demers; Michael Ezekowitz Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2008-11
Authors: Hugh J Lavery; Adam W Levinson; Adele R Hobbs; Dov Sebrow; Nihal E Mohamed; Michael A Diefenbach; David B Samadi Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Julie Hallet; Jesse Zuckerman; Matthew P Guttman; Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Alyson Mahar; Antoine Eskander; Wing C Chan; Amy Hsu; Victoria Barabash; Natalie Coburn Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Jeremy Balch; Alexander L Ayzengart; Patrick J Tighe; Parisa Rashidi; Azra Bihorac; Gilbert R Upchurch Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Yanjun Li; Jeremy Balch; Allyson C Cook; Patrick J Tighe; Philip A Efron; Gilbert R Upchurch; Parisa Rashidi; Xiaolin Li; Azra Bihorac Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Jason W Smith; Jennifer Knight Davis; Catherine C Quatman-Yates; Brittany L Waterman; Scott A Strassels; Jen D Wong; Victor K Heh; Holly E Baselice; Guy N Brock; Brian C Clark; John F P Bridges; Heena P Santry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jessica N Cohan; Brian Orleans; Federica S Brecha; Lyen C Huang; Angela Presson; Angela Fagerlin; Elissa M Ozanne Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 2.192