Literature DB >> 20689918

Comparison of cardiac output and blood volumes in intrathoracic compartments measured by ultrasound dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution methods.

Gennady Galstyan1, Mychaylo Bychinin, Mikael Alexanyan, Vladimir Gorodetsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare cardiac output (CO) and blood volumes measured by COstatus(®) (Transonic Systems Inc., NY, USA) versus PiCCO (Philips IntelliVue MP40 with PiCCO-technology module M3012A#10, Netherlands) in adult ICU patients.
METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study. Each of the 30 patients studied received a 5-Fr Pulsiocath femoral arterial and a standard central venous catheter. Twenty ml of iced 5% dextrose solution was injected for PiCCO measurements. For COstatus measurements, an extracorporeal arteriovenous loop, with two sensors placed on it, was connected between the Pulsiocath femoral arterial and central venous catheters. Blood was circulated through this loop at 12 ml/min for 5-8 min using a pump. Twenty ml of warm saline was injected into the venous side for measurements. For each method, three injections were averaged for comparison.
RESULTS: A good agreement for measured CO (range 3.65-16.3 l/min) with a percentage error of 20% was observed, with r = 0.95, bias = -0.037 l/min. PiCCO's global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) was 2.5 times larger than the analogous COstatus's total end-diastolic volume (TEDV) [TEDV = 0.28 × GEDV + 176 ml]. PiCCO's intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) was larger than the analogous COstatus's central blood volume (CBV) [CBV = 0.73 × (ITBV) +78 ml].
CONCLUSIONS: CO measured by COstatus was found to be equivalent and hence interchangeable with PiCCO in this study population. COstatus blood volumes were found to be within the expected physiological range whilst PiCCO blood volumes were significantly higher, which was also observed in other studies. Future studies using 3D echo/MRI are required to validate these blood volumes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689918     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  14 in total

1.  Cardiac output and central blood volume during hemodialysis: methodology.

Authors:  N M Krivitski; T A Depner
Journal:  Adv Ren Replace Ther       Date:  1999-07

2.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Calculated global end-diastolic volume does not correspond to the largest heart blood volume: a bias for cardiac function index?

Authors:  François Gilles Brivet; Frédéric Jacobs; Patrice Colin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  High values of intrathoracic blood volume in hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Authors:  Deepak Joshi; Elizabeth Sizer; William Bernal; Julia Wendon; Georg Auzinger
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Cardiac output measurement using an ultrasound dilution method: a validation study in ventilated piglets.

Authors:  Willem P de Boode; Arno F J van Heijst; Jeroen C W Hopman; Ronald B Tanke; Hans G van der Hoeven; Kian D Liem
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.

Authors:  B D Spiess; M A Patel; L O Soltow; I H Wright
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Reliability of clinical monitoring to assess blood volume in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C R Shippy; P L Appel; W C Shoemaker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Theory and in vitro validation of a new extracorporeal arteriovenous loop approach for hemodynamic assessment in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Nikolai M Krivitski; Victor V Kislukhin; Naveen V Thuramalla
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Comparison of a new cardiac output ultrasound dilution method with thermodilution technique in adult patients under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Masato Tsutsui; Nobuhiro Matsuoka; Takehiko Ikeda; Yoshimitsu Sanjo; Tomiei Kazama
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of transpulmonary thermodilution and ultrasound dilution technique: novel insights into volumetric parameters from an animal model.

Authors:  Martin Boehne; Florian Schmidt; Lars Witt; Harald Köditz; Michael Sasse; Robert Sümpelmann; Harald Bertram; Armin Wessel; Wilhelm Alexander Osthaus
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Ultrasound dilution: an accurate means of determining cardiac output in children.

Authors:  Ivory Crittendon; William J Dreyer; Jamie A Decker; Jeffrey J Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  A modified method of measuring plasma volume with indocyanine green: reducing the frequency of blood sampling while maintaining accuracy.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi; Eun-Kyung Lee; Kyung Mi Kim; Do-Yang Park; Eun-Hwa Kang; Myojung Kim; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Validation of a new method based on ultrasound velocity dilution to measure cardiac output in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Alejandro A Floh; Gustavo La Rotta; Julius Z Wermelt; Patricia Bastero-Miñón; V Ben Sivarajan; Tilman Humpl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Validation of cardiac output measurement by ultrasound dilution technique with pulmonary artery thermodilution in a pediatric animal model.

Authors:  Edward Darling; Naveen Thuramalla; Bruce Searles
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2010: II. Pneumonia and infections, cardiovascular and haemodynamics, organization, education, haematology, nutrition, ethics and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Jennifer Hochman Cohn; J Sudharma Ranasinghe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 8.  Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: an overview of current cardiac output monitoring methods.

Authors:  Johan Huygh; Yannick Peeters; Jelle Bernards; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-12-16

9.  Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Yan Wang; Jing Shi; Zhiqiang Hua; Jinyu Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Indexing haemodynamic variables in young children.

Authors:  Theodor S Sigurdsson; Lars Lindberg
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.105

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.