Literature DB >> 20689182

Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females.

Kazutaka Ota1, Masanori Kohda, Tetsu Sato.   

Abstract

When males are the larger sex, a positive allometric relationship between male and female sizes is often found across populations of a single species (i.e. Rensch's rule). This pattern is typically explained by a sexual selection pressure on males. Here, we report that the allometric relationship was negative across populations of a shell-brooding cichlid fish Lamprologus callipterus, although males are extremely larger than females. Male L. callipterus collect and defend empty snail shells in each of which a female breeds. We found that, across six populations, male and female sizes are positively correlated with not only sexual and fecundity selection indices, but also with shell sizes. Given their different reproductive behaviours, these correlations mean that males are required to be more powerful, and thus larger, to transport larger shells, while female bodies are reduced to the shell size to enable them to enter the shells. Among the three size selections (sexual selection, fecundity selection and shell size), shell size explained the allometry, suggesting that females are more strongly subject to size selection associated with shell size availability than males. However, the allometry was violated when considering an additional population where size-selection regimes of males differed from that of other populations. Therefore, sexual size allometry will be violated by body size divergence induced by multiple selection regimes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689182     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-010-0030-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  16 in total

1.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; Robert P Freckleton; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Life-history variation and allometry for sexual size dimorphism in Pacific salmon and trout.

Authors:  Kyle A Young
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude?

Authors:  Wolf U Blanckenhorn; R Craig Stillwell; Kyle A Young; Charles W Fox; Kyle G Ashton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sexual selection explains sex-specific growth plasticity and positive allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a reef fish.

Authors:  Stefan P W Walker; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests.

Authors:  A V Hedrick; E J Temeles
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  THE IMPACT OF PREDATION ON LIFE HISTORY EVOLUTION IN TRINIDADIAN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA).

Authors:  David Reznick; John A Endler
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT BY FEMALE SPIDERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.

Authors:  John Prenter; Robert W Elwood; W Ian Montgomery
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  MODE OF SEXUAL SELECTION DETERMINED BY RESOURCE ABUNDANCE IN TWO SAND GOBY POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsgren; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Kai Lindström
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  9 in total

1.  Changes in reproductive life-history strategies in response to nest density in a shell-brooding cichlid, Telmatochromis vittatus.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Michio Hori; Masanori Kohda
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-11-17

2.  Why are reproductively parasitic fish males so small?--influence of tactic-specific selection.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Masanori Kohda; Tetsu Sato
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-10-23

3.  Parker's sneak-guard model revisited: why do reproductively parasitic males heavily invest in testes?

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Masanori Kohda; Michio Hori; Tetsu Sato
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-08-18

4.  The evolution of parental care in salamanders.

Authors:  Balázs Vági; Daniel Marsh; Gergely Katona; Zsolt Végvári; Robert P Freckleton; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Alternative Reproductive Tactics in the Shell-Brooding Lake Tanganyika Cichlid Neolamprologus brevis.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Mitsuto Aibara; Masaya Morita; Satoshi Awata; Michio Hori; Masanori Kohda
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-19

6.  The utility of geometric morphometrics to elucidate pathways of cichlid fish evolution.

Authors:  Michaela Kerschbaumer; Christian Sturmbauer
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-26

7.  Mating and Parental Care in Lake Tanganyika's Cichlids.

Authors:  Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 8.  Sex-specific aging in animals: Perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Anne M Bronikowski; Richard P Meisel; Peggy R Biga; James R Walters; Judith E Mank; Erica Larschan; Gerald S Wilkinson; Nicole Valenzuela; Ashley Mae Conard; João Pedro de Magalhães; Jingyue Ellie Duan; Amy E Elias; Tony Gamble; Rita M Graze; Kristin E Gribble; Jill A Kreiling; Nicole C Riddle
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 9.304

9.  Spawning coordination of mates in a shell brooding cichlid.

Authors:  Dolores Schütz; Zina Heg-Bachar; Michael Taborsky; Dik Heg
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.