Literature DB >> 21227335

The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests.

A V Hedrick1, E J Temeles.   

Abstract

Three major hypotheses, based upon mechanisms of sexual selection, intersexual food competition and reproductive role division, have been advanced to explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in body size and morphology of animals. Genetic models suggest that all of the hypotheses are plausible, and empirical studies demonstrate that each of the three mechanisms operates in natural populations. However, problems arise in testing hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: more than one mechanism may be operating simultaneously, and the demonstrated occurrence of a mechanism does not indicate that it actually results in selection for dimorphism. A recent statistical technique offers a solution to these problems and provides a promising new approach to the study of sexual dimorphism, in which researchers can assess the relative importance of each mechanism in present-day selection for sexual dimorphism within a species.
Copyright © 1989. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1989        PMID: 21227335     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90212-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  68 in total

1.  Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer.

Authors:  E Post; R Langvatn; M C Forchhammer; N C Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  T Leinonen; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Equal temperature-size responses of the sexes are widespread within arthropod species.

Authors:  Andrew G Hirst; Curtis R Horne; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Stable isotopes reveal individual variation in migration strategies and habitat preferences in a suite of seabirds during the nonbreeding period.

Authors:  Richard A Phillips; Stuart Bearhop; Rona A R McGill; Deborah A Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mimetic butterflies support Wallace's model of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Krushnamegh Kunte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Drought survival and reproduction impose contrasting selection pressures on maximum body size and sexual size dimorphism in a snake, Seminatrix pygaea.

Authors:  Christopher T Winne; John D Willson; J Whitfield Gibbons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Jill S Miller; Joanna L Rifkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Thermal phenotypic plasticity of body size in Drosophila melanogaster: sexual dimorphism and genetic correlations.

Authors:  Jean R David; Amir Yassin; Jean-Claude Moreteau; Helene Legout; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Sexual dimorphism and population divergence in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish genus Tropheus.

Authors:  Juergen Herler; Michaela Kerschbaumer; Philipp Mitteroecker; Lisbeth Postl; Christian Sturmbauer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Sexual size dimorphism in the evolutionary context of facultative paedomorphosis: insights from European newts.

Authors:  Mathieu Denoël; Ana Ivanović; Georg Dzukić; Milos L Kalezić
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.