Literature DB >> 15695207

Life-history variation and allometry for sexual size dimorphism in Pacific salmon and trout.

Kyle A Young1.   

Abstract

Allometry for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is common in animals, but how different evolutionary processes interact to determine allometry remains unclear. Among related species SSD (male : female) typically increases with average body size, resulting in slopes of less than 1 when female size is regressed on male size: an allometric relationship formalized as 'Rensch's rule' . Empirical studies show that taxa with male-biased SSD are more likely to satisfy Rensch's rule and that a taxon's mean SSD is negatively correlated with allometric slope, implicating sexual selection on male size as an important mechanism promoting allometry for SSD. I use body length (and life-history) data from 628 (259) populations of seven species of anadromous Pacific salmon and trout (Oncorhynchus spp.) to show that in this genus life-history variation appears to regulate patterns of allometry both within and between species. Although all seven species have intraspecific allometric slopes of less than 1, contrary to expectation slope is unrelated to species' mean SSD, but is instead negatively correlated with two life-history variables: the species' mean marine age and variation in marine age. Second, because differences in marine age among species render SSD and body size uncorrelated, the interspecific slope is isometric. Together, these results provide an example of how evolutionary divergence in life history among related species can affect patterns of allometry for SSD across taxonomic scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15695207      PMCID: PMC1634950          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon.

Authors:  A P Hendry; J K Wenburg; P Bentzen; E C Volk; T P Quinn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  R Shine
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data.

Authors:  A Purvis; A Rambaut
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1995-06

4.  Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on size allometry in two dung fly species with contrasting sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  Urs Kraushaar; Wolf U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A genetic analysis of body size in pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).

Authors:  T D Beacham; C B Murray
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.166

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Sexual selection explains sex-specific growth plasticity and positive allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a reef fish.

Authors:  Stefan P W Walker; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Wen Chao Liu; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Masanori Kohda; Tetsu Sato
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Size Dependent Male Reproductive Tactic in the Two-Spotted Goby (Gobiusculus flavescens).

Authors:  A C Utne-Palm; K Eduard; K H Jensen; I Mayer; P J Jakobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A genetic test of sexual size dimorphism in pre-emergent chinook salmon.

Authors:  Tosh W Mizzau; Shawn R Garner; Stephen A C Marklevitz; Graham J Thompson; Yolanda E Morbey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Latitudinal variation in sexual dimorphism in life-history traits of a freshwater fish.

Authors:  Satu Estlander; Kimmo K Kahilainen; Jukka Horppila; Mikko Olin; Martti Rask; Jan Kubečka; Jiří Peterka; Milan Říha; Hannu Huuskonen; Leena Nurminen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Sexual size dimorphism in the evolutionary context of facultative paedomorphosis: insights from European newts.

Authors:  Mathieu Denoël; Ana Ivanović; Georg Dzukić; Milos L Kalezić
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Yu Zeng; Cai Quan Zhou; Robert Jehle
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  James Dale; Peter O Dunn; Jordi Figuerola; Terje Lislevand; Tamás Székely; Linda A Whittingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation: Body morphology and coloration differentiation among brook trout populations of varying size.

Authors:  Carol Zastavniouk; Laura K Weir; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.