| Literature DB >> 28565440 |
John Prenter1, Robert W Elwood1, W Ian Montgomery1.
Abstract
We investigate the association between female reproductive investment, absolute size, and sexual size dimorphism in spiders to test the predictions of the fecundity-advantage hypothesis. The relationships between absolute size and sexual size dimorphism and aspects of female reproductive output are examined in comparative analyses using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We provide support for the idea that allometry for sexual dimorphism is the result of variation in female size more so than male size. Regression analyses suggest selection for increased fecundity in females. We argue that fecundity selection provides the only general explanation for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders. © 1999 The Society for the Study of Evolution.Keywords: Allometry; Araneae; body size; clutch size; comparative analysis; female reproductive output; life history; phytogeny; sexual dimorphism; spiders
Year: 1999 PMID: 28565440 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04580.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evolution ISSN: 0014-3820 Impact factor: 3.694