Literature DB >> 28568956

MODE OF SEXUAL SELECTION DETERMINED BY RESOURCE ABUNDANCE IN TWO SAND GOBY POPULATIONS.

Elisabet Forsgren1, Charlotta Kvarnemo1, Kai Lindström2.   

Abstract

We used field observations and experiments to show that sexual selection in two populations of sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus (Pisces, Gobiidae), was affected by differences in resource availability. Male sand gobies rely on empty mussel shells for nest building and spawning. The two populations differed considerably in nest-site abundance and sexual-selection regimes. In one population nest sites were scarce, leading to stronger male-male competition over nests, a higher nest site colonization rate and reduced potential for female choice compared with the other population that had a surplus of nests. In the high-competition population, males were larger than females, perhaps as a response to selection, whereas the other population was not sexually size dimorphic. The results from the field were confirmed in a pool experiment that demonstrated the effect of nest abundance on nest occupancy and male reproductive success. Larger males were more successful in obtaining nest sites in both high and low nest availability treatments. Larger males were also favored by females as mating partners, but only in the treatment with surplus nest sites. Nest shortage was associated with an increased potential for intrasexual selection (measured as the coefficient of variation), whereas the potential for intersexual selection was increased when nests were common. In conclusion, nest-site abundance can influence the relative contribution of intrasexual competition and mate choice in a population. Hence, resource availability can contribute to within-species variation in mating patterns. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gobiidae; Pomatoschistus minutus; nest site; population differences; resource abundance; sexual selection

Year:  1996        PMID: 28568956     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03875.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

2.  Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Masanori Kohda; Tetsu Sato
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Infections may select for filial cannibalism by impacting egg survival in interactions with water salinity and egg density.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Size Dependent Male Reproductive Tactic in the Two-Spotted Goby (Gobiusculus flavescens).

Authors:  A C Utne-Palm; K Eduard; K H Jensen; I Mayer; P J Jakobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ecological variation along the salinity gradient in the Baltic Sea Area and its consequences for reproduction in the common goby.

Authors:  Isabel Mück; Katja U Heubel
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies.

Authors:  Katja Heubel
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Understanding resource driven female-female competition: ovary and liver size in sand gobies.

Authors:  Aurora García-Berro; Johanna Yliportimo; Kai Lindström; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Endless forms of sexual selection.

Authors:  Willow R Lindsay; Staffan Andersson; Badreddine Bererhi; Jacob Höglund; Arild Johnsen; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Erica H Leder; Jan T Lifjeld; Calum E Ninnes; Mats Olsson; Geoff A Parker; Tommaso Pizzari; Anna Qvarnström; Rebecca J Safran; Ola Svensson; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Cascading effects of pre-adult survival on sexual selection.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Chelsea Langley; Elijah Reyes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Resource acquisition and pre-copulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Chelsea Langley; Elijah Reyes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.