Literature DB >> 25122866

Clinical characteristics of patients who test positive for Clostridium difficile by repeat PCR.

Daniel A Green1, Brie Stotler2, Dana Jackman3, Susan Whittier4, Phyllis Della-Latta4.   

Abstract

The high sensitivity of PCR assays for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has greatly reduced the need for repeat testing after a negative result. Nevertheless, a small subset of patients do test positive within 7 days of a negative test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients to determine when repeat testing may be appropriate. The results of all Xpert C. difficile PCR (Cepheid, Sunnyvale CA) tests performed in the clinical microbiology laboratory at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center (NYPH/CUMC) from 1 May 2011 through 6 September 2013, were reviewed. A retrospective case-control study was performed, comparing patients who tested positive within 7 days of a negative test result to a random selection of 50 controls who tested negative within 7 days of a negative test result. During the study period, a total of 14,875 tests were performed, of which 1,066 were repeat tests (7.2%). Eleven of these repeat tests results were positive (1.0%). The only risk factor independently associated with repeat testing positive was history of a prior CDI (odds ratio [OR], 19.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.0 to 19.5], P < 0.001). We found that patients who test positive for C. difficile by PCR within 7 days of a negative test are more likely to have a history of CDI than are patients who test negative with repeat PCR. This finding may be due to the high rate of disease relapse or the increased likelihood of empirical therapy leading to false-negative results in these patients.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25122866      PMCID: PMC4313214          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01659-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Relapse versus reinfection: surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Mini Kamboj; Perminder Khosa; Anna Kaltsas; N Esther Babady; Crystal Son; Kent A Sepkowitz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of two commercial molecular tests for the detection of Clostridium difficile in the routine diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  Valerija Zidarič; Bozena Kotnik Kevorkijan; Nadja Oresic; Sandra Janezic; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).

Authors:  Stuart H Cohen; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Ciaran P Kelly; Vivian G Loo; L Clifford McDonald; Jacques Pepin; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Alerting physicians during electronic order entry effectively reduces unnecessary repeat PCR testing for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Suzanne Spradley; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  An evaluation of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile infection by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Darrell S Pardi; Jon E Rosenblatt; Robin Patel; Patricia P Kammer; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Haihui Huang; Andrej Weintraub; Hong Fang; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  6 in total

1.  Characteristics and Antibiotic Use Associated With Short-Term Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Sol del Mar Aldrete; Matthew J Magee; Rachel J Friedman-Moraco; Austin W Chan; Grier G Banks; Eileen M Burd; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  The Role of Diagnostic Stewardship in Clostridioides difficile Testing: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Frances J Boly; Kimberly A Reske; Jennie H Kwon
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Diagnostic yield of repeat sampling with immunoassay, real-time PCR, and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in an epidemic and a non-epidemic setting.

Authors:  J van Prehn; C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Y H van Beurden; R van Houdt; S Vainio; C W Ang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Adrián Martínez-Meléndez; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza; Licet Villarreal-Treviño; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.

Authors:  Yanal M Murad; Justo Perez; Gustavo Ybazeta; Sarah Mavin; Sebastien Lefebvre; J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Reza Nokhbeh
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.