Literature DB >> 18845820

Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing.

Diana M Cardona1, Kenneth H Rand.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis, which have significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical. Repeat enzyme immunoassay testing for C. difficile toxin has been recommended because of <100% sensitivity. All C. difficile tests between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for results and testing patterns. The Wampole C. difficile Tox A/B II enzyme immunoassay kit was used. There were a total of 8,256 tests from 3,112 patients; 49% of tests were repeated. Of the 3,749 initially negative patient tests, 96 were positive upon repeat testing within 10 days of the first test. Of repeat tests, 0.9% repeated on day 0 (same day as the first test), 1.8% on day 1, 3.8% on day 2, 2.6% on day 3, 5.4% on days 4 to 6, and 10.6% on days 7 to 10 were positive. Thirty-eight patients had a positive test within 48 h of an initial negative test, and based on chart review, 18 patients were treated empirically while 16 were treated following the new result. None had evidence of medical complications. Of initially positive patients, 91% were positive upon repeat testing on day 0, 75% on day 1, and 58% on day 2, to a low of 14% on days 7 to 10. Depending on the clinical setting, these data support not repeating C. difficile tests within 2 days of a negative result and limiting repeat testing to >/=1 week of a positive result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18845820      PMCID: PMC2576601          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00931-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  24 in total

1.  Clinical usefulness of components of the Triage immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B, and cytotoxin B tissue culture assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea.

Authors:  Viki Massey; Daniel B Gregson; Abdul H Chagla; Miriam Storey; Michael A John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  An update on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Daniel M Musher
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Laboratory testing considerations for C. difficile disease.

Authors:  David F Welch
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-01

4.  Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.

Authors:  H Rüssmann; K Panthel; R-C Bader; C Schmitt; R Schaumann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe.

Authors:  E J Kuijper; B Coignard; P Tüll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  David K Turgeon; Thomas J Novicki; John Quick; LaDonna Carlson; Pat Miller; Bruce Ulness; Anne Cent; Rhoda Ashley; Ann Larson; Marie Coyle; Ajit P Limaye; Brad T Cookson; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lukas Fenner; Andreas F Widmer; Gisela Goy; Sonja Rudin; Reno Frei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The lack of value of repeated Clostridium difficile cytotoxicity assays.

Authors:  A A Renshaw; J M Stelling; M H Doolittle
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Clostridium difficile toxin A.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; N M Sullivan; T D Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clostridium difficile colitis: an efficient clinical approach to diagnosis.

Authors:  Y C Manabe; J M Vinetz; R D Moore; C Merz; P Charache; J G Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  18 in total

1.  Reducing Unnecessary and Duplicate Ordering for Ovum and Parasite Examinations and Clostridium difficile PCR in Immunocompromised Patients by Using an Alert at the Time of Request in the Order Management System.

Authors:  Caitlin C Otto; Susan L Shuptar; Philippe Milord; Connor J Essick; Reshma Nevrekar; Svetlana L Granovsky; Susan K Seo; N Esther Babady; Steven C Martin; Yi-Wei Tang; Melissa S Pessin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing?

Authors:  J L Leslie; S H Cohen; J V Solnick; C R Polage
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Impact of an electronic hard-stop clinical decision support tool to limit repeat Clostridioides difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay testing on test utilization.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Kimberly A Reske; Tiffany Hink; Ronald Jackups; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Susan Novak-Weekley; Christopher W Woods; Lance R Peterson; Thomas Davis; Paul Schreckenberger; Ferric C Fang; Andre Dascal; Dale N Gerding; Jim H Nomura; Richard V Goering; Thomas Akerlund; Alice S Weissfeld; Ellen Jo Baron; Edith Wong; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Joseph Whitmore; David H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Ann M Larson; Angela M Fung; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification of a pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and the effect of repeated testing, sensitivity, and specificity on perceived prevalence of CDI.

Authors:  Marina Litvin; Kimberly A Reske; Jennie Mayfield; Kathleen M McMullen; Peter Georgantopoulos; Susan Copper; Joan E Hoppe-Bauer; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.