Literature DB >> 20685052

Interrelationships between 3-T-MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derivedbone mineral density.

Ahi Sema Issever1, Thomas M Link, David Newitt, Thelma Munoz, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

Recently, 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced for bone imaging. Through higher signal-to-noise ratios, as compared to 1.5-T MRI, it promises to be a more powerful tool for the assessment of cortical and trabecular bone measures. The goal of our study was to compare MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone measures to quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-derived bone mineral density (BMD). Using 3-T MRI in 51 postmenopausal women, apparent (app.) measures of bone volume/total volume, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation were derived at the distal radius, distal tibia and calcaneus. Cortical thickness (Ct.Th) was calculated at the distal radius and distal tibia. These measures were compared to QCT-derived BMD of the spine, hip and radius. Significant correlations ((*)P<.05; (**)P<.001; (***)P<.0001) were found between spine BMD- and MRI-derived Ct.Th (r(radius)=.55, (*)P<.05; r(tibia)=.67, (***)P<.0001) and app. Tb.N (r(radius)=.33, (*)P<.05; r(tibia)=.35, (*)P<.05) at the radius and tibia. Furthermore, within the first 10 mm at the radius, an inverse correlation for Ct.Th and app. BV/TV (r(6mm)=-.56, P<.001; r(10mm)=-.36, P<.05) and app. Tb.Th (r(6mm)=-.54, P<.001; r(10mm)=-.41, P<.05) was found.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685052      PMCID: PMC2963712          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  27 in total

1.  Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

Authors:  C A Sell; J N Masi; A Burghardt; D Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Summary--Measuring "bone quality".

Authors:  D P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

3.  Strength and size of bone in relation to calcium intake.

Authors:  G H Bell; D P Cuthbertson; J Orr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1941-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Changes in calcaneal trabecular bone structure assessed with high-resolution MR imaging in patients with kidney transplantation.

Authors:  T M Link; K Kisters; M Kempkes; M Kosch; D Newitt; Y Lu; S Waldt; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Osteoporosis: clinical assessment with quantitative MR imaging in diagnosis.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J C Ford; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; K E Warden; W W Scott; G U Rao
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Trabecular structure quantified with the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in postmenopausal women contributes to vertebral deformity burden independent of areal vertebral BMD.

Authors:  Glenn A Ladinsky; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Michael Wald; Babette S Zemel; Peter J Snyder; Louise Loh; Hee Kwon Song; Punam K Saha; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cylinders or walls? A new computational model to estimate the MR transverse relaxation rate dependence on trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  Bernd Müller-Bierl; Olivia Louis; Yves Fierens; Nico Buls; Robert Luypaert; Johan de Mey
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  MRI of the temporo-mandibular joint: which sequence is best suited to assess the cortical bone of the mandibular condyle? A cadaveric study using micro-CT as the standard of reference.

Authors:  Christoph A Karlo; Raphael Patcas; Thomas Kau; Helmut Watzal; Luca Signorelli; Lukas Müller; Oliver Ullrich; Hans-Ulrich Luder; Christian J Kellenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Garrett V Christensen; Hiroaki Ishikawa; Heath B Henninger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Megan Mills; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-11

5.  Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-based apparent bone volume fraction in peri-articular tibial bone of cadaveric knees.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Driban; Mary F Barbe; Mamta Amin; Neil S Kalariya; Ming Zhang; Grace H Lo; Anna M Tassinari; Daniel Harper; Lori Lyn Price; Charles B Eaton; Erika Schneider; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.