Literature DB >> 15868282

Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

C A Sell1, J N Masi, A Burghardt, D Newitt, T M Link, S Majumdar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to use high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 3 Tesla (3T) to quantify trabecular bone structure in vitro using femoral head specimens, and to correlate the calculated structure measures with those that were determined using microcomputed tomography (microCT), the standard of reference. Fifteen cylindrical cores were obtained from fresh femoral heads after total hip arthroplasty. MR images were obtained at 3T using a transmit-receive wrist coil. High-resolution coronal images were acquired using a modified three-dimensional (3D) fast-gradient echo sequence. From these data sets two-dimensional (2D) structural parameters analogous to bone histomorphometry were derived by using both mean intercept length (MIL) methods based on the plate model and the more recent model-assumption free 3D distance-transformation (DT) methods. The parameters measured by the 2D plate model-based MIL method and the DT method included apparent (App). BV/TV (bone volume/total volume), App. Tb.Th (trabecular thickness), App. Tb.Sp (trabecular separation), and App. Tb.N (trabecular number). Identical regions of interest were analyzed in the MR images and the microCT data sets, and similar structure measures were derived. The means and standard deviations of the parameters over all slices were calculated and MR-derived measures were correlated with those derived from the microCT data sets using linear regression analyses. Structure measures were overestimated with MRI, for example, the mean App. BV/TV was 0.45 for MRI and 0.20 for microT, and the slope of the graph was 1.45. App. Tb.Th was overestimated by a factor of 1.9, whereas App. Tb.Sp was underestimated; Tb.N showed the smallest effect. Correlations between the individual parameters were excellent (App. BV/TV, r2 = 0.82; App. Tb.Sp, r2 = 0.84; App. Tb.N, r2 = 0.81), except for App.Tb.Th (r2 = 0.67). The results of this study show that trabecular bone structure measures may be obtained using 3T MR imaging. These measures, although higher than the standard of reference, show a highly significant correlation with true structure measures obtained by microCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868282      PMCID: PMC2838764          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0111-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  40 in total

Review 1.  NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  J L Kuhn; S A Goldstein; L A Feldkamp; R W Goulet; G Jesion
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  High-resolution three-dimensional micro-computed tomography detects bone loss and changes in trabecular architecture early: comparison with DEXA and bone histomorphometry in a rat model of disuse osteoporosis.

Authors:  Odile Barou; David Valentin; Laurence Vico; Cathrine Tirode; Alain Barbier; Christian Alexandre; Marie-Hélène Lafage-Proust
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia.

Authors:  R S Siffert; G M Luo; S C Cowin; J J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  C L Gordon; C E Webber; N Christoforou; C Nahmias
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. Summary of proposed system.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-04

8.  Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Newitt; M Jergas; A Gies; E Chiu; D Osman; J Keltner; J Keyak; H Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  MicroCT evaluation of normal and osteoarthritic bone structure in human knee specimens.

Authors:  Vikas Patel; Ahi Sema Issever; Andrew Burghardt; Andres Laib; Michael Ries; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive assessment of bone microarchitecture by MRI.

Authors:  Glenn A Ladinsky; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

4.  Adaptations in trabecular bone microarchitecture in Olympic athletes determined by 7T MRI.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; S Kubilay Pakin; Mark E Schweitzer; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Interrelationships between 3-T-MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derivedbone mineral density.

Authors:  Ahi Sema Issever; Thomas M Link; David Newitt; Thelma Munoz; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Radiographic texture analysis of densitometer-generated calcaneus images differentiates postmenopausal women with and without fractures.

Authors:  T J Vokes; M L Giger; M R Chinander; T G Karrison; M J Favus; L B Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Osteoporotic changes of subchondral trabecular bone in osteoarthritis of the knee: a 3-T MRI study.

Authors:  K Chiba; M Uetani; Y Kido; M Ito; N Okazaki; K Taguchi; H Shindo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.