Literature DB >> 16340121

Summary--Measuring "bone quality".

D P Fyhrie1.   

Abstract

The idea of bone quality is well-established in the literature and represents a real conundrum in the treatment of osteoporosis. On the one hand, there are measurements for patients that predict fracture risk for the population as a whole, but between individual patients, one will fracture but another will not, despite the fact that all of the technical measurements we use to predict fracture risk are the same. There are, of course, many aspects of bone mechanical properties that cannot yet be measured in patients. The session began with a discussion of what bone quality is, then the speakers presented work on novel aspects of bone properties that could help explain why fracture prediction in vivo is inexact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16340121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  16 in total

1.  Bone quality: from bench to bedside: opening editorial comment.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Eve Donnelly; J Gregory Kinnett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Interrelationships between 3-T-MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derivedbone mineral density.

Authors:  Ahi Sema Issever; Thomas M Link; David Newitt; Thelma Munoz; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  The contribution of the extracellular matrix to the fracture resistance of bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Alexander J Makowski
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Effect of different voxel sizes on the accuracy of CBCT measurements of trabecular bone microstructure: A comparative micro-CT study.

Authors:  Mahmure Ayşe Tayman; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Mert Ocak; Doğukan Özen
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-04-28

7.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Assessment of the changes in alveolar bone quality after fixed orthodontic therapy: A trabecular structure analysis.

Authors:  Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar; Hooman Zarif Najafi; Maryam Sabet; Maryam Saki
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-12-21

9.  In vitro Evaluation of the Relationship between Gray Scales in Digital Intraoral Radiographs and Hounsfield Units in CT Scans.

Authors:  L Khojastepour; S Mohammadzadeh; M Jazayeri; M Omidi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Bone quality: an empty term.

Authors:  Harri Sievänen; Pekka Kannus; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.