Literature DB >> 20680405

Confounding from cryptic relatedness in haplotype-based association studies.

Feng Zhang1, Hong-Wen Deng.   

Abstract

Cryptic relatedness was suggested to be an important source of confounding in population-based association studies (PBAS). The impact of cryptic relatedness on the performance of haplotype phase inference and haplotype-based association tests is not clear. In this study, we used the Hapmap genetic data to simulate a set of related samples. We evaluated the accuracy of haplotype phase inferred by PHASE 2.1 and calculated the power, type I error rates, accuracy and positive prediction value (PPV) of haplotype frequency-based association tests (HFAT) and haplotype similarity-based association tests (HSAT) under various scenarios, considering relatedness levels, disease models and sample sizes. Cryptic relatedness appeared to slightly increase the accuracy of haplotype phase inference. We observed significant negative effect of cryptic relatedness on the performance of HFAT and HSAT. Ignoring cryptic relatedness may increase spurious association results in haplotype-based PBAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680405     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-010-9476-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  32 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in 313 human genes.

Authors:  J C Stephens; J A Schneider; D A Tanguay; J Choi; T Acharya; S E Stanley; R Jiang; C J Messer; A Chew; J H Han; J Duan; J L Carr; M S Lee; B Koshy; A M Kumar; G Zhang; W R Newell; A Windemuth; C Xu; T S Kalbfleisch; S L Shaner; K Arnold; V Schulz; C M Drysdale; K Nandabalan; R S Judson; G Ruano; G F Vovis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The importance of genealogy in determining genetic associations with complex traits.

Authors:  D L Newman; M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Qualitative semi-parametric test for genetic associations in case-control designs under structured populations.

Authors:  H-S Chen; X Zhu; H Zhao; S Zhang
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhu; ShuangLin Zhang; Hongyu Zhao; Richard S Cooper
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance.

Authors:  N E Morton; A Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling.

Authors:  N Risch; J Teng
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Analysis of five deep-sequenced trio-genomes of the Peninsular Malaysia Orang Asli and North Borneo populations.

Authors:  Lian Deng; Haiyi Lou; Xiaoxi Zhang; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Dongsheng Lu; Christian R Marshall; Chang Liu; Bo Xie; Wanxing Xu; Lai-Ping Wong; Chee-Wei Yew; Aghakhanian Farhang; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Mohammad Zahirul Hoque; Abdul Rahman Thuhairah; Bhak Jong; Maude E Phipps; Stephen W Scherer; Yik-Ying Teo; Subbiah Vijay Kumar; Boon-Peng Hoh; Shuhua Xu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.