Literature DB >> 9736746

Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance.

N E Morton1, A Collins.   

Abstract

Family-based procedures such as the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) were motivated by concern that sample-based methods to map disease genes by allelic association are not robust to population stratification, migration, and admixture. Other factors to consider in designing a study of allelic association are specification of gene action in a weakly parametric model, efficiency, diagnostic reliability for hypernormal individuals, interest in linkage and imprinting, and sibship composition. Family-based samples lend themselves to the TDT despite its inefficiency compared with cases and unrelated normal controls. The TDT has an efficiency of 1/2 for parent-offspring pairs and 2/3 for father-mother-child trios. Against cases and hypernormal controls, the efficiency is only 1/6 on the null hypothesis. Although dependent on marker gene frequency and other factors, efficiency for hypernormal controls is always greater than for random controls. Efficiency of the TDT is increased in multiplex families and by inclusion of normal sibs, approaching a case-control design with normal but not hypernormal controls. Isolated cases favor unrelated controls, and only in exceptional populations would avoidance of stratification justify a family-based design to map disease genes by allelic association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9736746      PMCID: PMC21652          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  On estimating the relation between blood group and disease.

Authors:  B WOOLF
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1955-06       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Genetic structure of forensic populations.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Logarithm of odds (lods) for linkage in complex inheritance.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods to map oligogenes by linkage.

Authors:  P Liò; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Haplotype analysis of hemochromatosis: evaluation of different linkage-disequilibrium approaches and evolution of disease chromosomes.

Authors:  R S Ajioka; L B Jorde; J R Gruen; P Yu; D Dimitrova; J Barrow; E Radisky; C Q Edwards; L M Griffen; J P Kushner
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  LODs past and present.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans.

Authors:  N Risch; H Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision, and admixture.

Authors:  W J Ewens; R S Spielman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene.

Authors:  M Samson; F Libert; B J Doranz; J Rucker; C Liesnard; C M Farber; S Saragosti; C Lapoumeroulie; J Cognaux; C Forceille; G Muyldermans; C Verhofstede; G Burtonboy; M Georges; T Imai; S Rana; Y Yi; R J Smyth; R G Collman; R W Doms; G Vassart; M Parmentier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

Authors:  R S Spielman; R E McGinnis; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  44 in total

1.  The optimal measure of allelic association.

Authors:  N E Morton; W Zhang; P Taillon-Miller; S Ennis; P Y Kwok; A Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The power of genomic control.

Authors:  S A Bacanu; B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model.

Authors:  G A Satten; W D Flanders; Q Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Statistical approaches to gene mapping.

Authors:  J Ott; J Hoh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Population admixture may appear to mask, change or reverse genetic effects of genes underlying complex traits.

Authors:  H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples.

Authors:  S Zhang; H Zhao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects.

Authors:  S L Slager; D J Schaid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Simple and complex ABCR: genetic predisposition to retinal disease.

Authors:  R Allikmets
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  The discovery of susceptibility genes for mental disorders.

Authors:  C Robert Cloninger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The future of association studies of common cancers.

Authors:  Richard S Houlston; Julian Peto
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.