Literature DB >> 9386336

A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers.

J Artun1, A T Spadafora, P A Shapiro.   

Abstract

The present study was performed to test the tendency for plaque and calculus build-up along the wire of different types of bonded orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers, whether the presence of such retainers causes any damage to the teeth involved, the failure rate of the retainers, and any changes in incisor alignment during a 3-year period of retention. The four test groups received either retainers made of thick plain wire bonded only to the canines (n = 11); thick spiral wire bonded only to the canines (n = 13); thin, flexible spiral wire bonded to each tooth (n = 11); or removable retainers (n = 14). Accumulation of plaque and calculus along the gingival margin, gingival inflammation and probing attachment level were scored in lingual areas from canine to canine at the time of fixed appliance removal and again 3 years after retainer insertion. Incisor irregularity was measured on plaster models made at the same time periods. Accumulation of plaque and calculus and development of caries along the wire were scored at follow-up. Retainer failures were recorded whenever they occurred. The results revealed no intergroup differences in changes between baseline and follow-up examinations or status along the retainer wire for any of the variables. Gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation were scored less frequently after 3 years in retention than at the time of debonding. No signs of caries were seen adjacent to the wire. Failures were observed of one, four and three of the fixed retainer types, respectively. These patients showed a greater increase in incisor irregularity than the other patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386336     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/19.5.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  34 in total

1.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations.

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Terki K Al-Mutairi; Zaki W Hakami; Mohammad M Al-Malki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Survival of post-treatment canine-to-canine lingual retainers with fiber-reinforced composite resin: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Roberto Briguglio; Francesco Mangano; Lorenzo Azzi; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Francesco Briguglio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.

Authors:  M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience.

Authors:  Katharina Scheibe; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Netrporn Chinvipas; Yuh Hasegawa; Kazuto Terada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Biofilm formation on stainless steel and gold wires for bonded retainers in vitro and in vivo and their susceptibility to oral antimicrobials.

Authors:  Marije A Jongsma; Floris D H Pelser; Henny C van der Mei; Jelly Atema-Smit; Betsy van de Belt-Gritter; Henk J Busscher; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Correlation between parodontal indexes and orthodontic retainers: prospective study in a group of 16 patients.

Authors:  D DI Venere; F Pettini; G M Nardi; A Laforgia; G Stefanachi; V Notaro; B Rapone; F R Grassi; M Corsalini
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

9.  Lower fixed retainers: bonded on all teeth or only on canines? A systematic review.

Authors:  Larissa Barbosa Moda; Ana Luiza Correa da Silva Barros; Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes; David Normando; Lucianne Cople Maia; Sissy Maria Dos Anjos Mendes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Does the decision to extract influence the development of gingival recessions? A retrospective long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Nicolas M Villard; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.