Literature DB >> 10532157

Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers.

K W Lumsden1, G Saidler, J H McColl.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of a number of patient and clinical variables on the breakage of bonded retainers, and consisted of a retrospective review of the survival of 200 bonded retainers. Data was collected from two clinical centres between November 1996 and February 1997. The subjects comprised 198 patients of both sexes divided into three age groups. Retainers at both centres were made in 018-inch co-axial wire with Relyabond and Helioprogress adhesives used at each respective centre. The effects on time to first breakage of adhesive, patient sex, and arch (upper/lower) were considered using Kaplan Meier survival graphs and in Log Rank Tests. Finally, a Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to examine the joint effects of these factors and the patients' ages. Breakage over a 5-year period with Relyabond was 38.8 per cent upper, 22.1 per cent lower, and with Helioprogress 75 per cent upper and 23.2 per cent lower. Breakage appears to be unrelated to the materials used or to the age and sex of the patients. Upper retainers break more often than lowers (P = 0.016) and early breakage is more likely to occur at an adhesive pad than at a wire (9.6 versus 2.5 per cent within 6 months).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10532157     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/26.3.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  12 in total

1.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations.

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Terki K Al-Mutairi; Zaki W Hakami; Mohammad M Al-Malki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Survival of post-treatment canine-to-canine lingual retainers with fiber-reinforced composite resin: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Roberto Briguglio; Francesco Mangano; Lorenzo Azzi; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Francesco Briguglio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience.

Authors:  Katharina Scheibe; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Netrporn Chinvipas; Yuh Hasegawa; Kazuto Terada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium-iron-boron magnet chain.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Wiebke Wasser-Merkel; Katharina Lange; Rudolf M Gruber; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Dankmar Ihlow
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication.

Authors:  Asli Baysal; Tancan Uysal; Nisa Gul; Melike Busra Alan; Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  A comparative evaluation of lingual retainer failure bonded with or without liquid resin.

Authors:  Farhan Bazargani; Sven Jacobson; Bertil Lennartsson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Upper bonded retainers.

Authors:  Eva Schneider; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ammar Salim Kadhum; Akram Faisal Alhuwaizi
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.