Eva Schneider1, Sabine Ruf. 1. Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany. sabine.ruf@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period. RESULTS: A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines. CONCLUSIONS: Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and type of upper bonded retainer failure and to identify possible predisposing factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 466 consecutive patients with upper bonded retainers were analyzed retrospectively with respect to retainer failures and failure type as well as timing of failure, differences among operators, and the number of defects of the multibracket appliances (MB) prior to the retention period. RESULTS: A total of 58.2% of all patients experienced retainer failures. The average failure odds were 1.26 failures per retainer. The odds were highest for 3-3 retainers (1.37) and lowest for the 1-1 retainer (0.54). The detachment and total loss rates were significantly influenced by operator experience-both rates were lower for experienced practitioners. Total retainer losses occurred more frequently in case of previous MB defects, while retainer fractures were seen more frequently when the retainer included the canines. CONCLUSIONS: Upper bonded retainer failures are a frequent problem during the retention period (58.2% of patients). Less operator experience correlated with higher failure rates. An increased number of total retainer losses must also be expected with a decreasing number of bonding sites and in cases involving previous MB defects.
Authors: M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: Cleo Wouters; Toon A Lamberts; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Anne Marie Renkema Journal: Orthod Craniofac Res Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Thikriat S Al-Jewair; Mohammad A Hamidaddin; Hamdan M Alotaibi; Nasser D Alqahtani; Sahar F Albarakati; Eman A Alkofide; Khalid A Al-Moammar Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.484