Literature DB >> 20676251

Attitudes of Family Physicians, Specialists and Radiologists about the Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ontario.

John J You1, Wendy Levinson, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to reduce wait times for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Ontario, little is known about physicians' attitudes regarding contemporary patterns of CT and MRI scan use in this province.
METHODS: We interviewed 19 Ontario family physicians, specialists and radiologists from diverse settings between November 2006 and April 2007. Our detailed written notes were independently reviewed to identify major recurring themes.
RESULTS: MAJOR THEMES WERE GROUPED UNDER TWO CATEGORIES: (a) non-clinical reasons for ordering CT and MRI ("defensive ordering," indeterminate imaging reports, patient demand, supply-induced demand, marked variation in ordering practices) and (b) communication among groups of physicians (increasing isolation between clinicians and radiologists; specialists and family physicians working in silos).
CONCLUSION: These interviews revealed infrequent communication among physician groups and marked variations in ordering practices that are often driven by a number of non-clinical factors, such as fear of litigation and patient demand. Recent increases in CT and MRI capacity may not be leading to better care for patients. Our findings, however, are very preliminary and require validation in other studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20676251      PMCID: PMC2732655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  18 in total

1.  The relationship between the supply of cardiac catheterization laboratories, cardiologists and the use of invasive cardiac procedures in northern New England.

Authors:  D Wennberg; J Dickens; D Soule; M Kellett; D Malenka; J Robb; T Ryan; W Bradley; P Vaitkus; M Hearne; G O'Connor; R Hillman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

2.  Legal actions against doctors down 50% in past decade.

Authors:  Deborah Jones
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse?

Authors:  E S Fisher; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Socio-cultural implications of changing organizational technologies in the provision of care.

Authors:  David Mechanic
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result.

Authors:  I G McDonald; J Daly; V M Jelinek; F Panetta; J M Gutman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-10

7.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Indications for and results of outpatient computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Ontario.

Authors:  John J You; Ian Purdy; Deanna M Rothwell; Raymond Przybysz; Jiming Fang; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.248

9.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; M Reardon; J P Stewart; J Maloney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Opening of specialty cardiac hospitals and use of coronary revascularization in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Mary A M Rogers; Michael E Chernew; Harlan M Krumholz; Kim A Eagle; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  The catastrophization effects of an MRI report on the patient and surgeon and the benefits of 'clinical reporting': results from an RCT and blinded trials.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Dilip Chand Raja; Bhari Thippeswamy Pushpa; Kumar Behera Ananda; Shetty Ajoy Prasad; Mugesh Kanna Rishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Observation Units as Substitutes for Hospitalization or Home Discharge.

Authors:  Saul Blecker; Nicholas P Gavin; Hannah Park; Joseph A Ladapo; Stuart D Katz
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a reduction in diagnostic imaging in degenerative spinal disorders.

Authors:  Joanne S M Kim; Joyce Z Dong; Stacey Brener; Peter C Coyte; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-11

4.  Primary care management of headaches and how direct-access MRI fits: a qualitative study of UK general practitioners' views.

Authors:  Raphael Underwood; Rachael Kilner; Leone Ridsdale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Should GPs have direct access to imaging for headache? A qualitative study of patients' views in the UK.

Authors:  Alison McKinlay; Raphael Underwood; Gabriella Wojewodka; Asif Mazumder; Rachael Kilner; Leone Ridsdale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.