Literature DB >> 18697720

Indications for and results of outpatient computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Ontario.

John J You1, Ian Purdy, Deanna M Rothwell, Raymond Przybysz, Jiming Fang, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Population rates of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continue to increase markedly. However, little is known about the indications for and results of these imaging tests.
METHODS: A cross-sectional chart-abstraction study was used to determine the indications for and results of outpatient CT and MRI scans performed on or after January 1, 2005, at randomly selected Ontario hospitals.
RESULTS: We studied 11,824 CT and 11,867 MRI scans. Cancer-related indications accounted for over 50% of CT scans of the abdomen-pelvis and chest. Headache was the most frequent indication for CT of the brain. More than one-half of MRI scans of the extremities were for knee pain or suspected meniscal tear. Back pain and radiculopathy were the most frequent indications for MRI of the spine. There was considerable variation between institutions in ordering patterns, with as much as a 70-fold difference between hospitals in the frequency of scans ordered for a specific indication. Less than 2% of CT scans of the brain for headache found abnormalities that could explain the headache, while over 90% of MRI scans of the spine for back pain were abnormal, although the clinical importance of the abnormalities was unclear.
CONCLUSIONS: These data are a starting point for a discussion about appropriateness. Further information will be obtained by examining individual indications more closely, and linking these data to administrative databases to evaluate the impact of these imaging tests on clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  14 in total

Review 1.  Effective spine triage: patterns of pain.

Authors:  Hamilton Hall
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Access without Appropriateness: Chicken Little in Charge?

Authors:  Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-08

3.  Imaging in a 35-year-old woman with progressive headache.

Authors:  Santanu Chakraborty; William D Miller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Attitudes of Family Physicians, Specialists and Radiologists about the Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ontario.

Authors:  John J You; Wendy Levinson; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  A scoping review of appropriateness of care research activity in Canada from a health system-level perspective.

Authors:  Susan Brien; Galina Gheihman; Yi Ki Yvonne Tse; Mary Byrnes; Sophia Harrison; Mark J Dobrow
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-05

6.  Effect of increased MRI and CT scan utilization on clinical decision-making in patients referred to a surgical clinic for back pain.

Authors:  Adrienne L K Li; David Yen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Impact of restricting diagnostic imaging reimbursement for uncomplicated low back pain in Ontario: a population-based interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Fine; Susan E Schultz; Lawrence White; David Henry
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-10-13

8.  Neuroimaging for the evaluation of chronic headaches: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 9.  The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up of dementia: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2014-02-01

10.  Better access to outpatient magnetic resonance imaging in Ontario - But for whom?

Authors:  John J You; Vikram Venkatesh; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.