Literature DB >> 8433468

Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

I G Stiell1, G H Greenberg, R D McKnight, R C Nair, I McDowell, M Reardon, J P Stewart, J Maloney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate and refine previously derived clinical decision rules that aid the efficient use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
DESIGN: Survey prospectively administered in two stages: validation and refinement of the original rules (first stage) and validation of the refined rules (second stage).
SETTING: Emergency departments of two university hospitals. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of adults with acute ankle injuries: 1032 of 1130 eligible patients in the first stage and 453 of 530 eligible patients in the second stage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attending emergency physicians assessed each patient for standardized clinical variables and classified the need for radiography according to the original (first stage) and the refined (second stage) decision rules. The decision rules were assessed for their ability to correctly identify the criterion standard of fractures on ankle and foot radiographic series. The original decision rules were refined by univariate and recursive partitioning analyses. MAIN
RESULTS: In the first stage, the original decision rules were found to have sensitivities of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.0) for detecting 121 maleolar zone fractures, and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.0) for detecting 49 midfoot zone fractures. For interpretation of the rules in 116 patients, kappa values were 0.56 for the ankle series rule and 0.69 for the foot series rule. Recursive partitioning of 20 predictor variables yielded refined decision rules for ankle and foot radiographic series. In the second stage, the refined rules proved to have sensitivities of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.0) for 50 malleolar zone fractures, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.0) for 19 midfoot zone fractures. The potential reduction in radiography is estimated to be 34% for the ankle series and 30% for the foot series. The probability of fracture, if the corresponding decision rule were "negative," is estimated to be 0% (95% CI, 0% to 0.8%) in the ankle series, and 0% (95% CI, 0% to 0.4%) in the foot series.
CONCLUSION: Refinement and validation have shown the Ottawa ankle rules to be 100% sensitive for fractures, to be reliable, and to have the potential to allow physicians to safely reduce the number of radiographs ordered in patients with ankle injuries by one third. Field trials will assess the feasibility of implementing these rules into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433468     DOI: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  87 in total

1.  Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  S Perry; N Raby; P T Grant
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

2.  Clinical decision rules in the emergency department.

Authors:  I G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A systematic process for converting text-based guidelines into a linear algorithm for electronic implementation.

Authors:  D F Lobach; N Kerner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  John Heyworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

5.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  J Heyworth
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Controversies in cervical spine imaging in trauma patients.

Authors:  Richard H Daffner
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-06-25

7.  Physicians, information technology, and health care systems: a journey, not a destination.

Authors:  Clement J McDonald; J Marc Overhage; Burke W Mamlin; Paul D Dexter; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Diagnostic classification in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis: physicians' judgement or a decision rule?

Authors:  Geert-Jan Geersing; Kristel J Janssen; Ruud Oudega; Henk van Weert; Henri Stoffers; Arno Hoes; Karel Moons
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  [The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].

Authors:  P Garcés; S Gurucharri; C Ibiricu; M Izuel; J Mozo; P Buil; J Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  N-methyl pyrrolidone promotes ankle fracture healing by inhibiting inflammation via suppression of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway.

Authors:  Jun Bian; Dan Cao; Jie Shen; Bo Jiang; Dan Chen; Lanzheng Bian
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.