Literature DB >> 26619756

Observation Units as Substitutes for Hospitalization or Home Discharge.

Saul Blecker1, Nicholas P Gavin2, Hannah Park3, Joseph A Ladapo4, Stuart D Katz5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Observation unit admissions have been increasing, a trend that will likely continue because of recent changes in reimbursement policies. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the availability of observation units on hospitalizations and discharges to home for emergency department (ED) patients.
METHODS: We studied ED visits with a final diagnosis of chest pain in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2007 to 2010. ED visits that resulted in an observation unit admission were propensity-score matched to visits at hospitals without an observation unit. We used logistic regression to develop a prediction model for hospitalization versus discharge home for matched patients treated at nonobservation hospitals. The model was applied to matched observation unit patients to determine the likely alternative disposition had the observation unit not been available.
RESULTS: There were 1,325 eligible visits that represented 5,079,154 visits in the United States. Two hundred twenty-seven visits resulted in an observation unit admission. The predictive model for hospitalization had a c statistic of 0.91; variables significantly associated with subsequent hospitalization included age, history of coronary atherosclerosis, systolic blood pressure less than 115 beats/min, and administration of antianginal medications. When the model was applied to matched observation unit patients, 49.9% of them were categorized as discharge home likely.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we estimated that half of ED visits for chest pain that resulted in an observation unit admission were made by patients who may have been discharged home had the observation unit not been available. Increased availability of observation units may result in both decreased hospitalizations and decreased discharges to home.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26619756      PMCID: PMC4976781          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  34 in total

1.  The relationship between the supply of cardiac catheterization laboratories, cardiologists and the use of invasive cardiac procedures in northern New England.

Authors:  D Wennberg; J Dickens; D Soule; M Kellett; D Malenka; J Robb; T Ryan; W Bradley; P Vaitkus; M Hearne; G O'Connor; R Hillman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

2.  Emergency department observation of heart failure: preliminary analysis of safety and cost.

Authors:  Alan B Storrow; Sean P Collins; Michael S Lyons; Lynne E Wagoner; W Brian Gibler; Christopher J Lindsell
Journal:  Congest Heart Fail       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

3.  A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators.

Authors:  M E Farkouh; P A Smars; G S Reeder; A R Zinsmeister; R W Evans; T D Meloy; S L Kopecky; M Allen; T G Allison; R J Gibbons; S E Gabriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Morris; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Understanding and interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: key questions and answers.

Authors:  Linda F McCaig; Catharine W Burt
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Observation and inpatient status: clinical impact of the 2-midnight rule.

Authors:  Ann M Sheehy; Bartho Caponi; Sreedevi Gangireddy; Azita G Hamedani; Jeffrey J Pothof; Eric Siegal; Ben K Graf
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO).

Authors:  M A Gomez; J L Anderson; L A Karagounis; J B Muhlestein; F B Mooers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prehospital use of aspirin rarely is associated with adverse events.

Authors:  Dan Quan; Frank LoVecchio; Bryan Clark; John V Gallagher
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.040

9.  Opening of specialty cardiac hospitals and use of coronary revascularization in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Mary A M Rogers; Michael E Chernew; Harlan M Krumholz; Kim A Eagle; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  6 in total

1.  National Burden of Heart Failure Events in the United States, 2006 to 2014.

Authors:  Sandra L Jackson; Xin Tong; Raymond J King; Fleetwood Loustalot; Yuling Hong; Matthew D Ritchey
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Characteristics of short general internal medicine hospital stays: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amol A Verma; Yishan Guo; Janice L Kwan; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Shail Rawal; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Fahad Razak
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Can an Emergency Department Observation Unit Reduce Hospital Admissions for COPD Exacerbation?

Authors:  Julia Budde; Parul Agarwal; Madhu Mazumdar; Jonathan Yeo; Sidney S Braman
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Emergency Department Visits and Subsequent Hospital Admission Trends for Patients with Chest Pain and a History of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Christine Eichelberger; Aarti Patel; Zhijie Ding; Christopher D Pericone; Jennifer H Lin; Christopher W Baugh
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-03-02

5.  Provocative biomarker stress test: stress-delta N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide.

Authors:  Alexander T Limkakeng; J Clancy Leahy; S Michelle Griffin; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Elias Jaffa; Robert H Christenson; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-10-08

6.  Who Has an Unsuccessful Observation Care Stay?

Authors:  Gelareh Z Gabayan; Brian Doyle; Li-Jung Liang; Kwame Donkor; David Yu-Chuang Huang; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.