Literature DB >> 8760739

Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result.

I G McDonald1, J Daly, V M Jelinek, F Panetta, J M Gutman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of failure of patient reassurance after a normal test result and study the determinants of failure.
DESIGN: Replicated single case study with qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
SETTING: University teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: 40 consecutive patients referred for echocardiography either because of symptoms (10 patients) or because of a heart murmur (30). 39 were shown to have a normal heart.
INTERVENTIONS: Medical consultations and semistructured patient interviews were tape recorded. Structured interviews with consultant cardiologists were recorded in survey form. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient recall of the explanation and residual understanding, doubt, and anxiety about the heart after the test and post-test consultation.
RESULTS: All 10 patients presenting with symptoms were left with anxiety about the heart despite a normal test result and reassurance by the consultant. Of 28 patients referred because of a murmur but shown to have no heart abnormality, 20 became anxious after detection of the murmur; 11 had residual anxiety despite the normal test result.
CONCLUSIONS: Reassurance of the "worried well"-anxious patients with symptoms or patients concerned by a health query resulting from a routine medical examination or from screening-constitutes a large part of medical practice. It seems to be widely assumed that explaining that tests have shown no abnormality is enough to reassure. The results of this study refute this and emphasise the importance of personal and social factors as obstacles to reassurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8760739      PMCID: PMC2351740          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7053.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  The contribution of a non-invasive test to clinical care. The impact of echocardiography on diagnosis, management and patient anxiety.

Authors:  I G McDonald; G H Guyatt; J M Gutman; V M Jelinek; P Fox; J Daly
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Views of what's wrong: diagnosis and patients' concepts of illness.

Authors:  L M Hunt; B Jordan; S Irwin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Abnormal illness behaviour.

Authors:  I Pilowsky
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1969-12

Review 4.  Controversies in the prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: a cardiological view.

Authors:  C M Oakley
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  An additional basic science for clinical medicine: II. The limitations of randomized trials.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Noninvasive tests in the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in children.

Authors:  J W Newburger; A Rosenthal; R G Williams; K Fellows; O S Miettinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-01-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Referrals to neurologists for headaches not due to structural disease.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Hopkins
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 10.154

  8 in total
  53 in total

1.  Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts. Negative results are not reassuring.

Authors:  R D Neal; S Morley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-10

2.  'I always seem to be there'--a qualitative study of frequent attenders.

Authors:  R D Neal; P L Heywood; S Morley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Chest pain in people with normal coronary anatomy.

Authors:  G Nijher; J Weinman; C Bass; J Chambers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

4.  The discomfort of patient power.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-02

Review 5.  US guidelines on neuroimaging in patients with non-acute headache: a commentary.

Authors:  Cathie Sudlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Mandatory ECG screening of athletes: is this question now resolved?

Authors:  Roy J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Reassuring patients about normal test results.

Authors:  Donald B Penzien; Jeanetta C Rains
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17

9.  Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Keith J Petrie; Jan Tobias Müller; Frederike Schirmbeck; Liesje Donkin; Elizabeth Broadbent; Christopher J Ellis; Greg Gamble; Winfried Rief
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-01-26

10.  Regression to the mean. A threat to exercise science?

Authors:  Roy J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.