Literature DB >> 20665033

[New DIN norms for determination of visual acuity].

W Wesemann1, U Schiefer, M Bach.   

Abstract

In 2009 the DIN 58220 norms for determination of visual acuity were revised. The new rules came into force on 1(st) November 2009. The new regulations on expert assessment of visual acuity (DIN norm 58220, part 3) are particularly important for ophthalmologists because as a result of the revisions the approach to testing visual acuity in patients with low acuity must be changed in the future. The background and potential problems will be presented and a simple solution for the lower acuity range will be suggested. Parts 5 (general test of vision) and 6 (driving-related vision test) of DIN 58220 remain practically unchanged. Part 7 of DIN 58220 is newly introduced, in which regulations for testing mesopic contrast vision with and without glare are defined for the first time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665033     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-010-2228-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  2 in total

1.  [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].

Authors:  B Rassow; Y Wang
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.

Authors:  W Grimm; B Rassow; W Wesemann; K Saur; R Hilz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.973

  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  [Ophthalmological assessment in procedures for disability benefits for the blind : Why medical certificates alone are insufficient].

Authors:  B von Livonius; H Pause; M Ulbig
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.

Authors:  Asli Inal; Osman Bulut Ocak; Ebru Demet Aygit; Ihsan Yilmaz; Berkay Inal; Muhittin Taskapili; Birsen Gokyigit
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  [New DIN and ISO norms for determination of visual acuity].

Authors:  W Wesemann; S P Heinrich; H Jägle; U Schiefer; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Statement of the Committee for Transport and Traffic Ophthalmology of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists Germany (BVA) and the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) : November 2018].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.

Authors:  O Engin; D D G Despriet; H M van der Meulen-Schot; A Romers; X Slot; M Tjon Fo Sang; M Fronius; H Kelderman; H J Simonsz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs.

Authors:  Simone Koenig; Felix Tonagel; Ulrich Schiefer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.

Authors:  Nils Kröger; Clemens Jürgens; Thomas Kohlmann; Frank Tost
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Refractive errors.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Christina Kraus; Peter Baumbach; Judith Ungewiß; Ralf Michels
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Quantification of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Space at Real-World Luminances and Contrasts: The VA-CAL Test.

Authors:  Julian Hilmers; Torsten Straßer; Michael Bach; Katarina Stingl; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

10.  Does intraocular straylight predict night driving visual performance? Correlations between straylight levels and contrast sensitivity, halo size, and hazard recognition distance with and without glare.

Authors:  Judith Ungewiss; Ulrich Schiefer; Peter Eichinger; Michael Wörner; David P Crabb; Pete R Jones
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.473

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.