Literature DB >> 8146001

Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.

W Grimm1, B Rassow, W Wesemann, K Saur, R Hilz.   

Abstract

The legibility of three selected sets of optotypes: (1) letters; (2) Snellen E; and (3) KOLT test have been compared to the Landolt ring in a study based on the German Standard DIN 58220, Part 2 and the International Standard ISO 8597. The letters were printed in the standard typeface used on German street signs (sans serif Linear-Antiqua, Typeface B). The main results are: 1. A set of letters can be selected in such a way that the differences in legibility displayed between different letters in the set are smaller than the ISO/DIN allowance of 0.05 logarithmic units of the visual angle, although the letters are not constructed according to the traditional 5 by 5 or 5 by 4 construction principles. 2. The eight letters C, D, E, K, N, P, U, Z are proposed for standardized visual acuity tests because of their almost equal legibility. 3. The height of the typeface used for this selected set of letters should be 5% less than the diameter of the Landolt ring in order to achieve the same legibility as the latter. 4. Both shape optotypes (Snellen E and KOLT test) must be approximately 15% smaller than the diameter of the Landolt ring in order to obtain comparable visual acuity scores.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8146001     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199401000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  [New DIN norms for determination of visual acuity].

Authors:  W Wesemann; U Schiefer; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination in cannabis users.

Authors:  Elena Mikulskaya; Frances Heritage Martin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.

Authors:  Marie Miwa; Masaki Iwanami; Mari S Oba; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Tomomi Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.

Authors:  Kenneth R Alexander; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Current concepts in the management of amblyopia.

Authors:  Blanca Ruiz de Zárate; Jaime Tejedor
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12

6.  Comparison of visual acuity estimates using three different letter charts under two ambient room illuminations.

Authors:  Ai-Hong Chen; Fatin Nur Najwa Norazman; Noor Halilah Buari
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.

Authors:  Nijil Sanker; Sayyeda Dhirani; Premjit Bhakat
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

8.  Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.

Authors:  Mladen Bušić; Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Petrovečki; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Senad Ramić; Daliborka Miletić; Lidija Andrijašević; Edita Kondža Krstonijević; Vid Jakovljević; Ana Bišćan Tvrdi; Jurica Predović; Antonio Kokot; Filip Bišćan; Mirna Kovačević Ljubić; Ranka Motušić Aras
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.351

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.