BACKGROUND: Many adult patients with secundum-type atrial septal defects (ASDs) are able to have these defects fixed percutaneously. Traditionally, this has involved an assessment of ASD size, geometry and atrial septal margins by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to percutaneous closure. This is a semi-invasive technique, and all of the information obtained could potentially be obtained by non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We compared the assessment of ASDs in consecutive patients being considered for percutaneous ASD closure using CMR and TOE. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ASDs diagnosed on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were invited to undergo both CMR and TOE. Assessment of atrial septal margins, maximal and minimal defect dimensions was performed with both techniques. Analyses between CMR and TOE were made using simple linear regression and Bland Altman Analyses. RESULTS: Total CMR scan time was 20 minutes, and comparable to the TOE examination time. A total of 20 patients (M:F = 5:15, mean age 42.8 years +/- 15.7) were included in the analyses. There was an excellent agreement between CMR and TOE for estimation of maximum defect size (R = 0.87). The anterior inferior, anterior superior and posterior inferior margins could be assessed in all patients with CMR. The posterior superior margin could not be assessed in only one patient. Furthermore, in 1 patient in whom TOE was unable to be performed, CMR was used to successfully direct percutaneous ASD closure. CONCLUSIONS: CMR agrees with TOE assessment of ASDs in the work-up for percutaneous closure. Potentially CMR could be used instead of TOE for this purpose.
BACKGROUND: Many adult patients with secundum-type atrial septal defects (ASDs) are able to have these defects fixed percutaneously. Traditionally, this has involved an assessment of ASD size, geometry and atrial septal margins by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to percutaneous closure. This is a semi-invasive technique, and all of the information obtained could potentially be obtained by non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We compared the assessment of ASDs in consecutive patients being considered for percutaneous ASD closure using CMR and TOE. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ASDs diagnosed on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were invited to undergo both CMR and TOE. Assessment of atrial septal margins, maximal and minimal defect dimensions was performed with both techniques. Analyses between CMR and TOE were made using simple linear regression and Bland Altman Analyses. RESULTS: Total CMR scan time was 20 minutes, and comparable to the TOE examination time. A total of 20 patients (M:F = 5:15, mean age 42.8 years +/- 15.7) were included in the analyses. There was an excellent agreement between CMR and TOE for estimation of maximum defect size (R = 0.87). The anterior inferior, anterior superior and posterior inferior margins could be assessed in all patients with CMR. The posterior superior margin could not be assessed in only one patient. Furthermore, in 1 patient in whom TOE was unable to be performed, CMR was used to successfully direct percutaneous ASD closure. CONCLUSIONS: CMR agrees with TOE assessment of ASDs in the work-up for percutaneous closure. Potentially CMR could be used instead of TOE for this purpose.
Authors: Christoph Weber; Michael Weber; Okan Ekinci; Thomas Neumann; Anja Deetjen; Andreas Rolf; Gerhard Adam; Christian W Hamm; Thorsten Dill Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-06-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Keila Lopez; Bharat V Dalvi; David Balzer; John L Bass; Tarek Momenah; Qi-Ling Cao; Ziyad M Hijazi Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: G Holmvang; I F Palacios; G J Vlahakes; R E Dinsmore; S W Miller; R R Liberthson; P C Block; B Ballen; T J Brady; H L Kantor Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M O Galal; A Wobst; Z Halees; L Hatle; A A Schmaltz; F Khougeer; E De Vol; M E Fawzy; F Abbag; F Fadley Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: W G Hundley; H F Li; R A Lange; D P Pfeifer; B M Meshack; J E Willard; C Landau; D Willett; L D Hillis; R M Peshock Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-06-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roman Nepomuceno; Matthew Zeglinski; Jordyn Lerner; Wlodzimierz Czarnecki; Iain D C Kirkpatrick; Jacek Strzelczyk; Davinder S Jassal Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Dudley J Pennell; John Paul Carpenter; David N Firmin; Philip J Kilner; Raad H Mohiaddin; Sanjay K Prasad Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-11-18 Impact factor: 5.364