Literature DB >> 20661749

A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Darren B van Beek1, Edward D Auyang, Nathaniel J Soper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen the publication of multiple case series investigating the feasibility of performing reoperative fundoplications using laparoscopic techniques. Most of these studies are small and reflect initial experiences with the procedure. To examine the collective experience with laparoscopic redo fundoplications, a systematic review was conducted.
METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (January 1999 to March 2010) were reviewed. A total of 17 series representing 1,167 cases were selected.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 51.8 years, and 42.8% of the patients were men. The most common indication for reoperation was recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the most common etiology of failure was herniation of the wrap. The mean operative time was 172 min, and the mean hospital stay was 2.8 days. Intraoperative complications occurred in 18.6% of cases, and the most common complication was gastrointestinal perforations (14.2%). The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 7.4%. The average postoperative follow-up period was 18 months. Postoperative complications were encountered with 16.9% of the patients, and the most common categorized complication was incisional hernia (1.6%). Success rates, defined variably, averaged 81%.
CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that although technically challenging, redo laparoscopic fundoplication can be an effective tool in the operative management of clinically significant problems after primary fundoplication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661749     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1254-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

1.  Surgical experience in fifty-five consecutive reoperative fundoplications.

Authors:  B Todd Heniford; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; Harrison Pollinger; Ronald F Sing
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  [A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis].

Authors:  R NISSEN
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1956-05-18

4.  Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia: an important complication of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P G Devitt; P C Mitchell; P A Game
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Hinder; C J Filipi; G Wetscher; P Neary; T R DeMeester; G Perdikis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P A Game; R S Williams; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Outcomes after minimally invasive reoperation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Hiran C Fernando; Neil A Christie; Percival O Buenaventura; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Philip R Schauer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; Tallal M Zeni; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Mick Meiselman; Minh Luu; Georgios D Ayiomamitis
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery: subjective and objective outcomes in 176 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Robert O'Rourke; Maria A Cassera; Prakash Gatta; Paul D Hansen; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Results of laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery: does the indication for redo surgery affect the outcome?

Authors:  P M Safranek; C J Gifford; M I Booth; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  27 in total

1.  Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.

Authors:  John T Paige; Timothy M Farrell; Simon Bergman; Niazy Selim; Alan E Harzman; Erin Schwarz; Yumi Hori; Jason Levine; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic Reoperative Anti-reflux Surgery: Low Perioperative Morbidity and High Symptom Resolution.

Authors:  Adham Elmously; Katherine D Gray; Timothy M Ullmann; Thomas J Fahey; Cheguevara Afaneh; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of esophageal and gastric perforation during laparoscopic foregut surgery: a retrospective review of 1,223 foregut cases.

Authors:  Linda P Zhang; Ronald Chang; Brent D Matthews; Michael Awad; Bryan Meyers; J Chris Eagon; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcome for Asymptomatic Recurrence Following Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wang; Tim Bright; Tanya Irvine; Sarah K Thompson; Peter G Devitt; David I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Rebecca P Petersen; L Michael Brunt; Nathaniel J Soper; Brett C Sheppard; Lee Mitsumori; Charles Rohrmann; Lee L Swanstrom; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Perioperative outcomes of surgical procedures for symptomatic fundoplication failure: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Sandeepa Musunuru; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally invasive Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a salvage operation after failed nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Joshua P Landreneau; Andrew T Strong; Matthew D Kroh; John H Rodriguez; Kevin El-Hayek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The role of short-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed antireflux surgery: a single-center 5-year experience.

Authors:  Konstantinos I Makris; Aru Panwar; Brittany L Willer; Anah Ali; Katherine L Sramek; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Does gastric resection have a role in the management of severe postfundoplication gastric dysfunction?

Authors:  Clancy J Clark; Michael G Sarr; Amindra S Arora; Francis C Nichols; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Revisional paraesophageal hernia repair outcomes compare favorably to initial operations.

Authors:  John Wennergren; Salomon Levy; Curtis Bower; Michael Miller; Daniel Borman; Daniel Davenport; Margaret Plymale; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.