Literature DB >> 9136821

Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

G R Locke1, N J Talley, S L Fett, A R Zinsmeister, L J Melton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux is considered a common condition, but detailed population-based data on reflux in the United States are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux in Olmsted County, Minnesota.
METHODS: A reliable and valid self-report questionnaire was mailed to an age- and sex-stratified random sample of 2200 Olmsted County residents aged 25-74 years.
RESULTS: The prevalence per 100 of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation experienced at least weekly was 19.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 17.7-21.9). Heartburn and acid regurgitation were associated with noncardiac chest pain (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% CI, 2.9-6.0), dysphagia (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.9-7.4), dyspepsia (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.0), and globus sensation (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.6) but not with asthma, hoarseness, bronchitis, or a history of pneumonia. Among subjects with reflux symptoms, 1.0% reported an episode of hematemesis and 1.3% had a past esophageal dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of reflux are common among white men and women who are 25-74 years of age. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are significantly associated with chest pain, dysphagia, dyspepsia, and globus sensation. The percentage of patients reporting complications is low, but the absolute number is probably considerable given the high prevalence of the condition in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9136821     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  503 in total

Review 1.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori: an intricate relation.

Authors:  D McNamara; C O'Morain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  S Nandurkar; N J Talley; C J Martin; T Ng; S Adams
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  No relation between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a Swedish population based study.

Authors:  J Lagergren; R Bergström; O Nyrén
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux as a risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A J Cameron; Y Romero
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  A review of reflux esophagitis around the world.

Authors:  Edwin J Zarling
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease is uncommon in Asia: evidence and possible explanations.

Authors:  Khek-Yu Ho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Rothman; C Farup; W Stewart; L Helbers; J Zeldis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Natural history of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Lars Agréus
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Lump or split dyspepsia? A continuing controversy.

Authors:  N J Talley; S Thitiphuree
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.