Literature DB >> 24196552

Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.

John T Paige1, Timothy M Farrell, Simon Bergman, Niazy Selim, Alan E Harzman, Erin Schwarz, Yumi Hori, Jason Levine, Daniel J Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an effort to fulfill its charge to develop and maintain a comprehensive educational program to serve the members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), the SAGES Continuing Education Committee (CEC) reports a summary of findings related to its evaluation of the 2012 SAGES annual meeting.
METHODS: All attendees to the 2012 annual meeting had the opportunity to complete an immediate postmeeting questionnaire as part of their continuing medical education (CME) certification in which they identified up to two learning themes, answered questions related to potential practice change items that are based on those learning themes, and complete a needs assessment related to important learning topics for future meetings. In addition, participants in the postgraduate and hands-on courses were asked to complete questions about case volume and comfort levels related to procedures/topics in those courses. All respondents to this initial survey were sent a 3-month follow-up questionnaire in which they were asked how successfully they had implemented the intended practice changes and what, if any, barriers they encountered. Postgraduate and hands-on course participants completed case volume and comfort level questions. Descriptive statistical analysis of this deidentified data was undertaken.
RESULTS: Response rates were 42% and 56% for CME-eligible attendees/respondents for the immediate postmeeting and 3-month follow-up questionnaires, respectively. Top learning themes for respondents were Bariatric, Hernia, Foregut, and Colorectal. Improving minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique and managing complications related to MIS procedures were top intended practice changes. Partial implementation was common with top barriers including cost restrictions, lack of institutional support, and lack of time.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2012 annual meeting analysis provides insight into educational needs among respondents and will help with planning content for future meetings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196552     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3263-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

Review 1.  Summaries of the SAGES 2007 reoperative minimally invasive surgery symposium.

Authors:  Fred Brody; Michael Holzman; Michael Tarnoff; Dmitry Oleynikov; John Marks; Bruce Ramshaw; Todd Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Lessons learned from the evolution of the laparoscopic revolution.

Authors:  E Christopher Ellison; Larry C Carey
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery (2011): a report from the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.

Authors:  Timothy M Farrell; Simon Bergman; Niazy Selim; John T Paige; Alan E Harzman; Erin Schwarz; Yumi Hori; Jason Levine; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Authors:  Darren B van Beek; Edward D Auyang; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Ongoing evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2014 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.

Authors:  Elisabeth C McLemore; John T Paige; Simon Bergman; Yumi Hori; Erin Schwarz; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGE(S) advice: application of a standardized train the trainer model for faculty involved in a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) hands-on course.

Authors:  Susannah M Wyles; Erin Schwarz; Jonathan Dort; Nabil Tariq; Tom Cecil; Mark G Coleman; John Paige; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Hands-on 2.0: improving transfer of training via the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT) program.

Authors:  Jonathan Dort; Amber Trickey; John Paige; Erin Schwarz; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Top Down or Bottom Up? Longitudinal assessment of the influence of professional practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery on program content for the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (2011-2016): a report from the SAGES Continuing Education Committee (CEC).

Authors:  Don Selzer; Timothy Farrell; Erin Schwarz; Michael Fu; Justin Wu; Angel Reyes; Niazy Selim; Lisa McLemore; Vanessa Palter; John Paige
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  All in: expansion of the acquisition of data for outcomes and procedure transfer (ADOPT) program to an entire SAGES annual meeting hands-on hernia course.

Authors:  Jonathan Dort; Amber Trickey; John Paige; Erin Schwarz; Tom Cecil; Mark Coleman; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  SAGES Reimagining Education & Learning (REAL) project.

Authors:  Jonathan Dort; John Paige; Alia Qureshi; Erin Schwarz; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.453

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.