Literature DB >> 17617884

Results of laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery: does the indication for redo surgery affect the outcome?

P M Safranek1, C J Gifford, M I Booth, T C B Dehn.   

Abstract

Short and medium term outcomes from laparoscopic antireflux surgery are generally excellent. A small number of patients suffer recurrent reflux or intolerable side-effects and may require reoperation. In this paper we describe our experience of 35 laparoscopic reoperations from a single center. Data on patients undergoing antireflux surgery in our unit has been prospectively collected and includes more than 600 primary laparoscopic antireflux operations since 1993. Laparoscopic reoperations have been performed between 1996 and 2005 for patients suffering recurrent reflux, dysphagia or severe gas bloat symptomatic despite medical treatment. All patients underwent preoperative barium studies and endoscopy with selective manometry and pH studies. Symptomatic outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks and 12 months with Visick scores. Anatomical results were assessed with barium studies at between 6 and 12 months. Thirty-five laparoscopic reoperations were performed in 20 women and 13 men (median age 56 years). Primary surgery had been performed in our unit in 27 (77%) and elsewhere in eight (23%). Median time from primary surgery was 28.5 months (5-360). Two patients underwent a second reoperation. Indication was recurrent reflux in 28 (80%), dysphagia in five (14%) and gas bloat in two (6%). Thirty-two of the 35 reoperations (91.4%) were completed laparoscopically, median operating time was 120.5 min (65-210) and median hospital stay 2 days. There was no mortality and there were only five minor complications. Twelve-month follow-up was available for 32 reoperations (91%). Overall good symptomatic outcomes were obtained in 26 (74%) Visick I or II at 6 weeks and 24 of 32 (75%) at 12 months. In reoperations for dysphagia/gas bloat there was a relative risk of 4.26 of a poor symptomatic outcome (Visick III or IV) at 12 months compared to those for recurrent reflux (P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Laparoscopic reoperation is feasible with low conversion rates and minimal morbidity for patients who have undergone previous abdominal or thoracic hiatal repair. Symptomatic outcomes are generally good, particularly if the indication is recurrent reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617884     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00719.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

1.  A retrospective multicenter analysis on redo-laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: conservative or conversion fundoplication?

Authors:  Al-Warith Al Hashmi; Guillaume Pineton de Chambrun; Regis Souche; Martin Bertrand; Vito De Blasi; Eric Jacques; Santiago Azagra; Jean Michel Fabre; Frédéric Borie; Michel Prudhomme; Nicolas Nagot; Francis Navarro; Fabrizio Panaro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Anatomical failure following laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS): does it really matter?

Authors:  N Dunne; J Stratford; L Jones; J Sohampal; R Robertson; M I Booth; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Authors:  Darren B van Beek; Edward D Auyang; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Modern medical and surgical management of difficult-to-treat GORD.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Daniel Sifrim; Radu Tutuian; Stephen Attwood; Lars Lundell
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Laparoscopic revision surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Haydar Celasin; Volkan Genc; Suleyman Utku Celik; Ahmet Gökhan Turkcapar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Edgar J B Furnée; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders; Hein G Gooszen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 3.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.