Literature DB >> 19216692

Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy.

Constantine T Frantzides1, Atul K Madan, Mark A Carlson, Tallal M Zeni, John G Zografakis, Ronald M Moore, Mick Meiselman, Minh Luu, Georgios D Ayiomamitis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms of failure after laparoscopic fundoplication and the results of revision laparoscopic fundoplication.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has become the most commonly performed antireflux procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, with success rates from 90 to 95%. Persistent or new symptoms often warrant endoscopic and radiographic studies to find the cause of surgical failure. In experienced hands, reoperative antireflux surgery can be done laparoscopically. We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplications done by the principle author and the respective fellow within the laparoscopic fellowship from 1992 to 2006.
METHODS: A review was performed on patients who underwent laparoscopic revision of a failed primary laparoscopic fundoplication.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication was performed on 68 patients between 1992 and 2006. The success rate of the laparoscopic redo Nissen fundoplication was 86%. Symptoms prior to the revision procedure included heartburn (69%), dysphagia (8.8%), or both (11.7%). Preoperative evaluation revealed esophagitis in 41%, hiatal hernia with esophagitis in 36%, hiatal hernia without esophagitis in 7.3%, stenosis in 11.74%, and dysmotility in 2.4%. The main laparoscopic revisions included fundoplication alone (41%) or fundoplication with hiatal hernia repair (50%). Four gastric perforations occurred; these were repaired primarily without further incident. An open conversion was performed in 1 patient. Length of stay was 2.5 +/- 1.0 days. Mean follow-up was 22 months (range, 6-42), during which failure of the redo procedure was noted in 9 patients (13.23%).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic redo antireflux surgery, performed in a laparoscopic fellowship program, produces excellent results that approach the success rates of primary operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19216692      PMCID: PMC3157335          DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  46 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  N J Soper; D Dunnegan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic redo Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  C T Frantzides; M A Carlson
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations?

Authors:  S Horgan; D Pohl; D Bogetti; T Eubanks; C Pellegrini
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08

5.  Is laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery feasible?

Authors:  N R Floch; R A Hinder; P J Klingler; S A Branton; M H Seelig; T Bammer; C J Filipi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-07

6.  Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The impact of operative technique.

Authors:  J G Hunter; L Swanstrom; J P Waring
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures.

Authors:  M J Curet; R K Josloff; O Schoeb; K A Zucker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-05

8.  Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P A Game; R S Williams; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A study of 362 consecutive laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications.

Authors:  C T Frantzides; C Richards
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic reoperations after failed and complicated antireflux operations.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; M Bafutto; C A Machado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Reoperative laparoscopic paraesophageal herniorrhaphy can produce excellent outcomes.

Authors:  Albert W Tsang; Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Chris U Okwuosa; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Reoperative antireflux surgery for dysphagia.

Authors:  András Légner; Kazuto Tsuboi; Lokesh Bathla; Tommy Lee; Lee E Morrow; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Authors:  Darren B van Beek; Edward D Auyang; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic revision surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Haydar Celasin; Volkan Genc; Suleyman Utku Celik; Ahmet Gökhan Turkcapar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Robert C Tolboom; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-01-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.