Literature DB >> 20649224

Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.

Eugene Brandewie1, Pavel Zahorik.   

Abstract

Although results from previous studies have demonstrated that the acoustic effects of a single reflection are perceptually suppressed after repeated exposure to a particular configuration of source and reflection, the extent to which this dynamic echo suppression might generalize to speech understanding in room environments with multiple reflections and reverberation is largely unknown. Here speech intelligibility was measured using the coordinate response measure corpus both with and without prior listening exposure to a reverberant room environment, which was simulated using virtual auditory space techniques. Prior room listening exposure was manipulated by presenting either a two-sentence carrier phrase that preceded the target speech, or no carrier phrase within the room environment. Results from 14 listeners indicate that with prior room exposure, masked speech reception thresholds were on average 2.7 dB lower than thresholds without exposure, an improvement in intelligibility of over 18 percentage points on average. This effect, which is shown to be absent in anechoic space and greatly reduced under monaural listening conditions, demonstrates that prior binaural exposure to reverberant rooms can improve speech intelligibility, perhaps due to a process of perceptual adaptation to the acoustics of the listening room.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649224      PMCID: PMC2921430          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Spectral weights in profile listening.

Authors:  B G Berg; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dynamic processes in the precedence effect.

Authors:  R L Freyman; R K Clifton; R Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada; R Batra; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effect of click rate and delay on breakdown of the precedence effect.

Authors:  R K Clifton; R L Freyman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

5.  Responses of low-frequency cells in the inferior colliculus to interaural time differences of clicks: excitatory and inhibitory components.

Authors:  L H Carney; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Unilateral ablation of the auditory cortex in the cat impairs complex sound localization.

Authors:  J Cranford; R Ravizza; I T Diamond; I C Whitfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Listeners' expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold.

Authors:  R K Clifton; R L Freyman; R Y Litovsky; D McCall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Left-right asymmetry in the buildup of echo suppression in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The precedence effect in three species of birds (Melopsittacus undulatus, Serinus canaria, and Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Micheal L Dent; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Responses to simulated echoes by neurons in the barn owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  26 in total

1.  Visual influences on echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise-masked speech in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptation to Room Acoustics Using the Modified Rhyme Test.

Authors:  Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2011-04-01

Review 5.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

6.  Neural coding of sound envelope in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Michaël C C Slama; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Speech intelligibility in rooms: Disrupting the effect of prior listening exposure.

Authors:  Eugene J Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Prior listening exposure to a reverberant room improves open-set intelligibility of high-variability sentences.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual Adaptation to Room Acoustics and Effects on Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired Populations.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik; Eugene Brandewie
Journal:  Proc. Forum Acust       Date:  2011-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.