Literature DB >> 8176056

Listeners' expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold.

R K Clifton1, R L Freyman, R Y Litovsky, D McCall.   

Abstract

Echo threshold increases with exposure to redundant trains of stimuli. Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that a change in the ongoing train would affect listeners' perception of the echo, but only if it signified an unusual change in room acoustics. The stimulus train was composed of 4-ms narrow-band noise bursts, with the leading sound from a loudspeaker placed 45 degrees left of midline and the lagging sound or simulated echo from 45 degrees right, delivered in an anechoic chamber. The lagging sound in the test noise, which followed the train after a 750-ms pause, came randomly from loudspeakers at 35 degrees or 55 degrees right, and the listener's task was to choose which position the echo came from on each trial. In experiment 1 the delay between onsets of the leading and lagging bursts was varied between train and test bursts, which simulated a sudden movement of the reflecting surface either toward the listener (if the delay of the test burst was shorter than the train) or away (if the delay was longer). In both cases listeners detected the echo's direction more easily, compared to trials when there was no change between train and test burst delays. In order to check whether any change between train and test bursts would increase echo discriminability, experiment 2 varied frequency and experiment 3 varied intensity. These variations were not expected to affect the echo's detectability because such changes signify that the original sound changed in these characteristics and the echo reflected these changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8176056     DOI: 10.1121/1.408540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Release and re-buildup of listeners' models of auditory space.

Authors:  Rachel Keen; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Time-forward speech intelligibility in time-reversed rooms.

Authors:  Laricia Longworth-Reed; Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Echolocation versus echo suppression in humans.

Authors:  Ludwig Wallmeier; Nikodemus Geßele; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

8.  Speech intelligibility in rooms: Disrupting the effect of prior listening exposure.

Authors:  Eugene J Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The precedence effect: fusion and lateralization measures for headphone stimuli lateralized by interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual Adaptation to Room Acoustics and Effects on Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired Populations.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik; Eugene Brandewie
Journal:  Proc. Forum Acust       Date:  2011-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.